Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37668
Title: Feasible approaches and implementation challenges to atrial fibrillation screening: a qualitative study of stakeholder views in 11 European countries
Authors: Engler, Daniel
Hanson, Coral L.
DESTEGHE, Lien 
Boriani, Giuseppe
Diederichsen, Soren Zoga
Freedman, Ben
Pala, Elena
Potpara, Tatjana S.
Witt, Henning
HEIDBUCHEL, Hein 
Neubeck, Lis
Schnabel, Renate B.
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Source: BMJ open, 12 (6) (Art N° e059156)
Abstract: Objectives Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening may increase early detection and reduce complications of AF. European, Australian and World Heart Federation guidelines recommend opportunistic screening, despite a current lack of clear evidence supporting a net benefit for systematic screening. Where screening is implemented, the most appropriate approaches are unknown. We explored the views of European stakeholders about opportunities and challenges of implementing four AF screening scenarios. Design Telephone-based semi-structured interviews with results reported using Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guidelines. Data were thematically analysed using the framework approach. Setting AF screening stakeholders in 11 European countries. Participants Healthcare professionals and regulators (n=24) potentially involved in AF screening implementation. Intervention Four AF screening scenarios: single time point opportunistic, opportunistic prolonged, systematic single time point/prolonged and patient-led screening. Primary outcome measures Stakeholder views about the challenges and feasibility of implementing the screening scenarios in the respective national/regional healthcare system. Results Three themes developed. (1) Current screening approaches: there are no national AF screening programmes, with most AF detected in symptomatic patients. Patient-led screening exists via personal devices, creating screening inequity. (2) Feasibility of screening: single time point opportunistic screening in primary care using single-lead ECG devices was considered the most feasible. Software algorithms may aid identification of suitable patients and telehealth services have potential to support diagnosis. (3) Implementation requirements: sufficient evidence of benefit is required. National screening processes are required due to different payment mechanisms and health service regulations. Concerns about data security, and inclusivity for those without primary care access or personal devices must be addressed. Conclusions There is an overall awareness of AF screening. Opportunistic screening appears the most feasible across Europe. Challenges are health inequalities, identification of best target groups for screening, streamlined processes, the need for evidence of benefit and a tailored approach adapted to national realities.
Notes: Engler, D (corresponding author), Univ Heart & Vasc Ctr Hamburg, Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Cardiol, Hamburg, Germany.; Engler, D (corresponding author), German Ctr Cardiovasc Res DZHK, Partner Site Hamburg Kiel Lubeck, Hamburg, Germany.
d.engler@uke.de
Keywords: cardiac epidemiology;general medicine (see internal medicine);quality in health care;risk management;stroke;preventive medicine
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37668
ISSN: 2044-6055
e-ISSN: 2044-6055
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059156
ISI #: 000814750800009
Rights: Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2023
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
e059156.full.pdfPublished version1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.