Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37788Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | GUNAWAN, Arien | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Bloemer, Jose | - |
| dc.contributor.author | VAN RIEL, Allard | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Essers, Caroline | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-19T08:40:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-19T08:40:19Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-07-18T11:38:04Z | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Sustainability (Basel), 14 (8772) (Art N° 8772) | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2071-1050 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37788 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The implementation of sustainability-oriented practices in small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) has been discussed frequently over the years. Recent studies on sustainability have focused mainly on links between ecological and economic sustainability. This exploratory study aims to explore institutional barriers and facilitators regarding the implementation of sustainability-oriented practices in the Indonesian batik industry and to provide policy recommendations. The Indonesian batik industry is well-known for its cultural heritage and for being part of the Indonesian identity. Batik products are mostly hand-crafted by women crafters. The study used in-depth insights from two focus groups conducted with entrepreneurs active in the batik industry, while also building on earlier empirical insights. The lack of customer knowledge and socio-cultural and regulatory factors were found to be barriers to sustainability in batik SMEs. Ecological, technological, socio-cultural, and political factors were found to facilitate achieving sustainability objectives. This study contributes to the sustainable entrepreneurship and women entrepreneurship literature by considering facilitators and barriers as they are experienced by batik entrepreneurs and by furthering the conceptualization of sustainable entrepreneurs as either "committed" or "followers". | - |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This article was funded by the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) from the Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia (grant number: 20140622100990). | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
| dc.rights | Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | - |
| dc.subject.other | batik industry | - |
| dc.subject.other | policy recommendations | - |
| dc.subject.other | sustainable entrepreneurship | - |
| dc.subject.other | female entrepreneurs | - |
| dc.title | Institutional Barriers and Facilitators of Sustainability for Indonesian Batik SMEs: A Policy Agenda | - |
| dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 8772 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 14 | - |
| local.format.pages | 26 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
| local.publisher.place | ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND | - |
| dc.relation.references | 1. Global Entrepreneurship Monitoring. Entrepreneurial Behavior and Attitudes. Available online: https://www.gemconsor- tium.org/economy-profiles/indonesia-2 (accessed on 19 June 2022). 2. Gunawan, A.A.; Essers, C.; Van Riel, A.C.R. The adoption of ecopreneurship practices in Indonesian craft SMEs: Value-based motivations and intersections of identities. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2021, 27, 730–752. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8772 24 of 26 3. Bastian, B.L.; Metcalfe, B.D.; Zali, M.R. Gender inequality: Entrepreneurship development in the MENA region. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6472. 4. The Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy. Panduan Pelaksanaan Kesehatan, Kebersihan, Keselamatan, dan Kelestarian Lingkungan untuk Sektor Ekonomi Kreatif. Available online: https://chse.kemenparekraf.go.id/storage/app/media/doku- men/Pedoman_Handbook_Ekraf_Upload.pdf (accessed on 2 July 2020). 5. Apriyani, N. Industri batik: Kandungan limbah cair dan metode pengolahannya. Media Ilm. Tek. Linkungan (MITL) 2018, 3, 21– 29. 6. EKONID. Clean Batik Initiative: Third Year Achievement Report; EKONID—German-Indonesian Chamber of Industry and Com- merce; EKONID: Jakarta, Indonesia. 7. Handayani, W.; Kristijanto, A.I.; Hunga, A.I.R. Behind the eco-friendliness of “batik warna alam”: Discovering the motives behind the production of batik in Jarum village, Klaten. Wacana 2018, 19, 235–256. 8. Romadhon, Y.A. Kebijakan pengelolaan air limbah dalam penanganan limbah batik di Kota Pekalongan. J. Int. Relat. 2017, 4, 49–64. 9. Syed Shaharuddin, S.I.; Shamsuddin, M.S.; Drahman, M.H.; Hasan, Z.; Mohd Asri, N.A.; Nordin, A.A.; Shaffiar, N.M. A review on the Malaysian and Indonesian batik production, challenges, and innovations in the 21st century. SAGE Open 2021, 11, 21582440211040128. 10. UNESCO. Indonesian Batik. Available online: https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/indonesian-batik-00170 (accessed on 6 December 2018). 11. European Commission. Gender Mainstreaming Active Inclusion Policies. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publica- tion-detail/-/publication/4afbebba-f022-4ed0-a2ce-a6ead22bc3f3/language-en (accessed on 22 June 2020). 12. Pujiastuti, L. Ada 47.000 IKM Batik, Serap Hampir 200.000 Tenaga Kerja. Detik Finance. 2015. Available online: https://fi- nance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-3034022/ada-47000-ikm-batik-serap-hampir200000-tenaga-kerja (accessed on 11 June 2020). 13. Rachman, F.F. Ada 15 Juta Tenaga Kerja Sektor Ekonomi Kreatif RI, Didominasi Wanita. Detik Finance. 2016. Available online: https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-3366119/ada-15-jutatenaga-kerja-sektorekonomi-kreatif-ri-didominasi- wanita (accessed on 12 June 2018). 14. Rachman, F.F. Bekraf dan BPS Luncurkan Data Statistik Ekonomi Kreatif 2016. Detik Finance. 2016. Available online: https://fi- nance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-3366011/bekraf-dan-bpsluncurkan-datastatistik-ekonomi-kreatif-2016 (accessed on 12 June 2018). 15. Investor Daily. Kemenperin Dorong Pertumbuhan Start-Up Kerajinan dan Batik. Available online: https://investor.id/busi- ness/kemenperin-dorong-pertumbuhan-startup-kerajinan-dan-batik (accessed on 22 June 2021). 16. Collins, E.; Roper, J.; Lawrence, S. Sustainability practices: Trends in New Zealand businesses. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2010, 19, 479–494. 17. Al Rasyid, M.R.; Asri, R.W.P. Waste prevention effectiveness of batik production in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Innovation, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 3–4 June 2014. 18. Handayani, W.; Kristijanto, A.I.; Hunga, A.I.R. A water footprint case study in Jarum village, Klaten, Indonesia: The production of natural-colored batik. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2019, 21, 1919–1932. 19. Rinawati, D.I.; Sari, D.P.; Nugroho, S.; Muljadi, F.; Lestari, S.P. Pengelolaan produksi menggunakan pendekatan lean and green untuk menuju industri batik yang berkelanjutan (Studi kasus di UKM batik Puspa Kencana). J. Tek. Ind. UNDIP 2013, 8, 43–50. 20. Yoshanti, G.; Dowaki, K. Batik life cycle assessment analysis (LCA) for improving batik small and medium enterprises’ (SMEs) sustainable production in Surakarta, Indonesia. In EcoProduction: Sustainability Through Innovation in Product Life Cycle Design; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2017; pp. 997–1008. 23. Gunawan, A.A.; Van Riel, A.C.R.; Essers, C. What drives ecopreneurship in women and men?—A structured literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 124336. 24. Spence, M.; Gherib, J.B.; Biwole, V.O. Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Is Entrepreneurial will Enough? A North-South Compari- son. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 99, 335–367. 26. Ghazilla, R.A.R.; Sakundarini, N.; Abdul-Rasyid, S.H.; Ayub, N.S.; Olugu, E.U.; Musa, S.N. Drivers and barriers analysis for green manufacturing practices in Malaysian SMEs: Preliminary findings. Procedia CIRP 2015, 26, 658–663. 27. Costache, C.; Dumitrascu, D.D.; Maniu, I. Facilitators of and barriers to sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises: A descriptive exploratory study in Romania. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3213. 28. Yaacob, M.R.; Zain, N.F.M. Modelling green batik industry—A strategy for sustainability in the craft industry in Malaysia. Int. J. Dev. Sustain. 2016, 5, 87–97. 21. Koe, W.-L.; Majid, I.A. Socio-cultural factors and intention towards sustainable entrepreneurship. Eurasian J. Bus. Econ. 2014, 7, 145–156. 22. Crnogaj, K.; Rebernik, M.; Hojnik, B.B.; Gomezelj, D.O. Building a model of researching the sustainable entrepreneurship in the tourism sector. Kybernetes 2014, 43, 377–393. 25. Ahmad, N.H.; Rahman, S.A.; Rajendran, N.L.K.A.; Halim, H.A. Sustainable entrepreneurship practices in Malaysian manufac- turing SMEs: The role of individual, organizational, and institutional factors. World Rev. Entrep. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 16, 153–171. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8772 25 of 26 29. Indrayani, L. Upaya strategis pengelolaan limbah industri batik dalam mewujudkan batik ramah lingkungan. In Proceedings of the Prosiding Seminar Nasional Industri Kerajinan dan Batik, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 8 October 2019. 30. Detik News. Batik Bersih, Batik Yang Ramah Lingkungan. Available online: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1576192/batik-ber- sih-batik-yang-ramah-lingkungan (accessed on 22 June 2020). 31. Syahputra, R.; Soesanti, I. Application of green energy for batik production process. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2016, 91, 249–256. 32. Rahmadyanti, E.; Prasetyo, K.; Nugrohoseno, D. Implementing cleaner production in small and medium batik industry as ef- forts on environmental management and improving working productivity. Ecol. Environ. Conserv. 2017, 23, 135–141. 33. Yaacob, M.R. A preliminary study of green micro-entrepreneurs in Kelantan, Malaysia. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2010, 5, 81–88. 34. Wu, J.; Si, S. Poverty reduction through entrepreneurship: Incentives, social networks, and sustainability. Asian Bus. Manag. 2018, 17, 243–259. 35. Pinget, A.; Bocquet, R.; Mothe, C. Barriers to environmental innovation in SMEs: Empirical evidence from French firms. Management 2015, 18, 132–155. 36. Hoogedoorn, B.; Van Der Zwan, P.; Thurik, R. Sustainable Entrepreneurship: The role of perceived barriers and risk. J. Bus. Ethics 2019, 157, 1133–1154. 37. Jaramillo, J.A.; Sossa, J.W.Z.; Mendoza, G.L.O. Barriers to sustainability for small and medium enterprises in the framework of sustainable development—Literature review. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 28, 512–524. 38. Switch-Asia. Advancing Sustainable Development and Women’s Empowerment in Asia: Experiences from the SWITCH-Asia Programme. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d3a049c6-7b1b-11e7-b2f2- 01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-37129709 (accessed on 2 July 2020). 42. Caldera, H.T.S.; Desha, C.; Dawes, L. Evaluating the enablers and barriers for successful implementation of sustainable business practice in ‘lean’ SMEs. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 218, 575–590. 46. Cho, E.-H.; Voss, H. Determinants of international environmental strategies of Korean firms: An explorative case-study ap- proach. Asian Bus. Manag. 2011, 10, 357–380. 47. Ghadge, A.; Kaklamanou, M. Implementing environmental practices within the Greek dairy supply chain: Drivers and barriers for SMEs. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 1995–2014. 49. Munoz, P.; Cohen, B. Sustainable entrepreneurship research: Taking stock and looking ahead. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2017, 27, 300–322. 50. Schwartz, S.H. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Read. Psychol. Cult. 2012, 2, 2307–0919. Available online: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article51116andcontext5orpc (accessed on 1 July 2019). 51. Be’nabou, R.; Tirole, J. Self-confidence and motivation. Q. J. Econ. 2002, 117, 871–915. 52. Wood, B.P.; Ng, P.Y.; Bastian, B.L. Hegemonic conceptualizations of empowerment in entrepreneurship and their suitability for collective contexts. Adm. Sci. 2021, 11, 1–17. 53. Venugopalan, M.; Bastian, B.L.; Viswanathan, P.K. The role of multi-actor engagement for women’s empowerment and entre- preneurship in Kerala, India. Adm. Sci. 2021, 11, 1–20. 54. Nyumba, T.O.; Wilsom, K.; Derrick, C.J.; Mukherjee, N. The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2017, 9, 20–32. 56. Redman-MacLaren, M.; Mills, J.; Tommbe, R. Interpretative focus group: A participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data. Glob. Health Action 2014, 7, 1–7. 57. Dos Santos Marques, I.C.; Theiss, L.M.; Johnson, C.Y.; Fouad, M.N.; Scarinci, I.C.; Chu, D.I. Implementation of virtual focus groups for qualitative data collection in a global pandemic. Am. J. Surg. 2021, 221, 918–922. 58. Lathen, L.; Laestadius, L. Reflections on Online Focus Group Research with Low Socio-Economic Status African American Adults During COVID-19. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2021, 20, 1–10. 59. Bernard, H.R. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 2nd ed.; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2013. 39. Harren, M. Application of Circular Economy to SME Batik Dyeing and Finishing: Sustainability Vetting of Ciwaringin Batik. Master’s Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Available online: http://urn.kb.se/re- solve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-248023 (accessed on 22 July 2021). 40. Pujotomo, D.; Sriyanto, S.; Widyawati, L. Analysis of the barriers of cleaner production implementation in Kampung Batik Semarang using interpretative structural modelling approach. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 1977, 020025. 41. Sulthonuddin, I.; Herdiansyah, H. Sustainability of batik wastewater quality management strategies: Analytical hierarchy pro- cess. Appl. Water Sci. 2021, 11, 1–12. 43. Purwandani, J.A.; Michaud, G. What are the drivers and barriers for green business practices adoption for SMEs? Environ. Syst. Decis. 2021, 41, 577–593. 44. Holman, D.; Walker, A. Understanding unequal ageing: Towards a synthesis of intersectionality and life course analyses. Eur. J. Ageing 2020, 18, 239–255. 45. Choroszewicz, M.; Adams, T.L. Gender and age in the professions: Intersectionality, meta-work, and social change. Prof. Prof. 2019, 9, 1–15. 48. UNIDO. National Resources Efficient and Cleaner Production (RECP) Programme in Indonesia. In Independent Terminal Evaluation; UNIDO: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2020. 55. Krueger, R.; Casey, M. Focus Group Interviewing. In Handbook of Practical Program Evolution, 4th ed.; Newcomer, K.E., Hatry, H.P., Wholey, J.S., Eds.; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 506–534. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8772 26 of 26 60. Guest, G.; Bunce, A.; Johnson, L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006, 18, 59–82. 61. Marshall, M.N. Sampling for Qualitative Research. Fam. Pract. 1996, 13, 522–525. 62. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample- size tool for thematic analysis. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2016, 19, 739–743. | - |
| local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Article | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.artnr | 8772 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/su14148772 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | 000832206500001 | - |
| local.provider.type | - | |
| local.uhasselt.international | yes | - |
| item.fullcitation | GUNAWAN, Arien; Bloemer, Jose; VAN RIEL, Allard & Essers, Caroline (2022) Institutional Barriers and Facilitators of Sustainability for Indonesian Batik SMEs: A Policy Agenda. In: Sustainability (Basel), 14 (8772) (Art N° 8772). | - |
| item.validation | ecoom 2023 | - |
| item.contributor | GUNAWAN, Arien | - |
| item.contributor | Bloemer, Jose | - |
| item.contributor | VAN RIEL, Allard | - |
| item.contributor | Essers, Caroline | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
| crisitem.journal.eissn | 2071-1050 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sustainability-14-08772.pdf | Published version | 527.37 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.