Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37863
Title: Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: a best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis
Authors: Jacxsens, Laura
De Pauw, Joke
Cardon, Emilie
Van Der Wal, Annemarie
Jacquemin, Laure
Gilles, Annick
MICHIELS, Sarah 
Van Rompaey, Vincent
Lammers, Marc
De Hertogh, Willem
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Source: Frontiers in neurology,
Abstract: Introduction Accumulating evidence suggests a role of the brainstem in tinnitus generation and modulation. Several studies in chronic tinnitus patients have reported latency and amplitude changes of the different peaks of the auditory brainstem response, possibly reflecting neural changes or altered activity. The aim of the systematic review was to assess if alterations within the brainstem of chronic tinnitus patients are reflected in short- and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Methods A systematic review was performed and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating short- and middle-latency AEPs in tinnitus patients and controls were included. Two independent reviewers conducted the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Meta-analysis was performed using a multivariate meta-analytic model. Results Twenty-seven cross-sectional studies were included. Multivariate meta-analysis revealed that in tinnitus patients with normal hearing, significantly longer latencies of auditory brainstem response (ABR) waves I (SMD = 0.66 ms, p < 0.001), III (SMD = 0.43 ms p < 0.001), and V (SMD = 0.47 ms, p < 0.01) are present. The results regarding possible changes in middle-latency responses (MLRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) were inconclusive. Discussion The discovered changes in short-latency AEPs reflect alterations at brainstem level in tinnitus patients. More specifically, the prolonged ABR latencies could possibly be explained by high frequency sensorineural hearing loss, or other modulating factors such as cochlear synaptopathy or somatosensory tinnitus generators. The question whether middle-latency AEP changes, representing subcortical level of the auditory pathway, are present in tinnitus still remains unanswered. Future studies should identify and correctly deal with confounding factors, such as age, gender and the presence of somatosensory tinnitus components.
Other: A preprint of this manuscript has been published on MedRxiv (https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.29.22270068)
Keywords: tinnitus;auditory evoked potentials;brainstem;auditory brainstem responses (ABRs);middle-latency responses (MLRs);frequency-following responses (FFRs);systematic review
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37863
ISSN: 1664-2295
e-ISSN: 1664-2295
DOI: doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.29.22270068
ISI #: 000874008700001
Rights: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2023
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fneur-13-941876.pdfPublished version2.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Mar 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.