Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38005
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPURZA, Simion-Adrian-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-07T10:47:07Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-07T10:47:07Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2022-08-29T09:57:29Z-
dc.identifier.citationLex et scientia (Bucureşti. Print), 2 (XXVIII) , p. 137 -162-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/38005-
dc.description.abstractIn the current international environment, an effective implementation of national security objectives is to a great extent dependant on the ability of national governments to ensure the highest possible degree of confidentiality to information used in strategical, as well as tactical decisions. Ensuring security of information has been a conundrum for all international organisations seeking to reach varying degrees of coordination, cooperation or integration. As the most ambitious of all, thus far, the EU has raised the bar even higher, especially in terms of desired cooperation in defence and security, where the drive for integrated defence procurement takes centre stage. Consequently, the issue of sharing (classified) information between the Member States and their relevant authorities is of fundamental importance. Against this backdrop, this paper seeks to identify potential regulatory solutions for the management of classified information that would effectively contribute to the final objective of integrating defence and security procurement, as envisaged by the Defence Procurement Directive 2009/81/EC. An essential prerequisite in this respect is to determine what legal solutions could better serve this purpose, starting from normative instruments already implemented at various levels in the EU institutional mechanism. To this end, the paper is based on a two-phased theoretical approach: (1) the material segment – the characteristics of an effective integrated system for security of information (within the scope of defence procurement integration) and (2) the procedural segment – how to apply a potential solution at EU level (by what means). Ancillary research questions are aimed, first, at understanding the current state of play of the EU regulatory framework pertaining to handling classified information, in terms of granting security clearances to both individuals and legal persons (private, as well as public).-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherUniversitatea Nicolae Titulescu-
dc.rightsBOAI (Budapest Open Access Initiative)-
dc.subject.othersecurity of information-
dc.subject.otherclassified information-
dc.subject.otherdefence procurement-
dc.subject.otherEU integration-
dc.titleExploring Existing and Potential Normative Solutions for an EU-Wide Legal Framework for Security of Information in the Context of Defence and Security Procurement-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage162-
dc.identifier.issueXXVIII-
dc.identifier.spage137-
dc.identifier.volume2-
local.format.pages25-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.placeBucharest, Romania-
dc.relation.references Curtin, Deirdre M., “Official secrets and the negotiation of international agreements: is the EU executive unbound?”, Common Market Law Review 50 (2013): 423-457  Curtin, Deirdre M., “Overseeing Secrets in the EU: A Democratic Perspective”, Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (2014): 684-700, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12123  Davis Cross, Mai’a K., Security Integration in Europe. How Knowledge-Based Networks are Transforming the European Union (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2014)  Dover, Robert, Goodman, Michael S. and Hillebrand, Claudia (eds), Routledge Companion to Intelligence Studies (New York: Routledge, 2014)  Driessen, Bart, Transparency in EU Institutional Law: A Practitioner’s Handbook (Kluwer Law International, 2nd ed., 2012)  Galloway, David, “Classifying secrets in the EU”, Journal of Common Market Studies 52, no. 3 (2014): 668-683, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12122  Labayle, Henri, Principles and procedures for dealing with European Union Classified Information in light of the Lisbon Treaty (European Parliament – Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, 2010), available at: https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2010/may/ep-classified-information-study.pdf [last accessed: 15.03.2021]  Neamțu, Bogdana and Dragoș, Dacian, “Freedom of Information in the European Union: Legal Challenges and Practices of EU Institutions”, in Dragoș, Dacian, Kovač, Polonca and Marseille, Albert (eds.), The Laws of Transparency in Action. A European Perspective (Palgrave MacMillan, 2019), 11-70, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76460-3_2  Purza, Simion-Adrian, “Setting the Scene for Defence Procurement Integration in the EU. The Intergovernmental Mechanisms”, European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review 13, no. 4 (2018): 257-269, https://doi.org/10.21552/epppl/2018/4/4  Roberts, Alasdair, “Entangling Alliances: NATO's Security of Information Policy and the Entrenchment of State Secrecy”, Cornell International Law Journal 36, no. 2 (2003): 329-360, https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol36/iss2/4  Rosén, Guri (2015), “EU Confidential: The European Parliament’s Involvement in EU Security and Defence Policy”, Journal of Common Market Studies 53, no. 2 (2015): 383-398, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12154  van Rossem, Jan Willem, “The Autonomy of EU Law: More is Less?” in Wessel, Ramses A. and Blockmans, Steven (eds.), Between Autonomy and Dependence. The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations (The Hague: Asser Press, 2013), 15-17 and 19, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-903-0_2  Trybus, Martin, Buying Defence and Security in Europe. The EU Defence and Security Procurement Directive in Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)  Consolidated Version of the Treaty Establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, Official Journal of the European Union C 203, 7.6.2016  Regulation (Euratom) No 3 implementing Article 24 of the Treaty Establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, Official Journal of the European Communities no. 406/58  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, Official Journal of the European Union L145, 31.5.2001  Directive 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain works contracts, supply contracts and service contracts by contracting authorities or entities in the fields of defence and security, and amending Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC, Official Journal of the European Union, L 216, 20.8.2009  Council Decision 2001/264/EC of 19 March 2001 adopting the Council's security regulations, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 101, 11.4.2001  Council Decision 2011/292/EU of 31 March 2011 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information, Official Journal of the European Union, L 141, 27.5.2011  Council Decision 2013/488/EU of 23 September 2013 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information, Official Journal of the European Union, L 274, 15.10.2013  Council Decision of 23 September 2013 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information, Official Journal of the European Union, L 274, 15.10.2013  Council Decision of 23 September 2013 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information, Official Journal of the European Union L 274, 15.10.2013  Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/444 of 13 March 2015 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information, Official Journal of the European Union L 72, 17.3.2015  Decision 24/95 of the Secretary-General of the Council of 30 January 1995 on measures for the protection of classified information applicable to the General Secretariat of the Council (not published)  Decision of the Secretary-General of the Council/High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy of 27 July 2000 on measures for the protection of classified information applicable to the General Secretariat of the Council, Official Journal of the European Communities, C 239, 23.8.2000  Interinstitutional Agreement of 12 March 2014 between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the common foreign and security policy, Official Journal of the European Union C 95, 1.4.2014  Agreement between the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, regarding the protection of classified information exchanged in the interests of the European Union, Official Journal of the European Union C202, 8.7.2011  Commission Staff Working Document: Evaluation of Directive 2009/81/EC on public procurement in the fields of defence and security, SWD (2016) 407 final, 94  Commission of the European Communities, ‘Commission Staff Working Document – Accompanying document to the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts in the fields of defence and security – Impact Assesment’, Brussels, 5.12.2007 SEC(2007) 1598, available at: https://secure.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/document/SEC20071598FIN.do [last accessed 8 January 2021]  Judgment of 6 December 2001, Council v. Hautala, C-353/99 P, ECLI:EU:C:2001:661  Judgment of 19 July 1999, Hautala v. Council, T-14/98, ECLI:EU:T:1999:157  Judgment of 1 February 2007, Sison v. Council, C-266/05 P, ECLI:EU:C:2007:75  Judgment of 26 April 2005, Sison v. Council, T-110/03, T-150/03 and T-405/03, ECLI:EU:T:2005:143  Judgment of 15 December 2009, Commision v. Germany, C-372/05, ECLI:EU:C:2009:780  Judgment of 4 June 2013, ZZ, C-300/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:363  Judgment of 20 March 2018, Commission v. Austria (State printing office), C-187/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:194  Judgment of 27 November 2019, Izuzquiza and Semsrott v. Frontex, T-31/18, ECLI:EU:T:2019:815  Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2007, Sweden v. Commission, C-64/05 P, ECLI:EU:C:2007:802  Opinion 2/00 of the Court, 6 December 2001, EU:C:2001:664-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1003087-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.validationvabb 2024-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationPURZA, Simion-Adrian (2021) Exploring Existing and Potential Normative Solutions for an EU-Wide Legal Framework for Security of Information in the Context of Defence and Security Procurement. In: Lex et scientia (Bucureşti. Print), 2 (XXVIII) , p. 137 -162.-
item.contributorPURZA, Simion-Adrian-
crisitem.journal.issn1583-039X-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LESIJ dec. 2021.pdf
  Restricted Access
Peer-reviewed author version330.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.