Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38065
Title: Two-year clinical outcomes after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation with balloon-expandable versus self-expanding valves: A subanalysis of the GALILEO trial
Authors: Okuno, Taishi
Dangas, George D.
Hengstenberg, Christian
Sartori, Samantha
Herrmann, Howard C.
de Winter, Robert
Gilard, Martine
Tchetche, Didier
Moellmann, Helge
Makkar, Raj R.
Baldus, Stephan
De Backer, Ole
Bendz, Bjorn
Kini, Annapoorna
von Lewinski, Dirk
Mack, Michael
Moreno, Raul
Schaefer, Ulrich
Woehrle, Jochen
Seeger, Julia
Snyder, Clayton
Nicolas, Johny
Tijssen, Jan G. P.
Welsh, Robert C.
VRANCKX, Pascal 
Valgimigli, Marco
Mehran, Roxana
Kapadia, Samir
Sondergaard, Lars
Windecker, Stephan
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: WILEY
Source: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 100 (4), p. 636-645
Abstract: Background Midterm data comparing clinical outcomes after successful implantation of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THV) are limited. We aimed to compare 2-year outcomes after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the Edwards balloon-expandable or the Medtronic self-expanding THV. Methods Two-year outcomes were analyzed according to the implanted THV in the GALILEO trial. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was a composite of all-cause death or thromboembolic events including stroke, myocardial infarction, symptomatic valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, deep-vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism. Results Among 1644 patients recruited in 136 centers across 16 countries between 2015 and 2018, 499 received a self-expanding and 757 patients received a balloon-expandable THV. Patients treated with a self-expanding THV were more likely to be female, and had higher surgical risk, lower hemoglobin levels, and more frequent valve-in-valve procedures than those with a balloon-expandable THV. After multivariable adjustment, there were no significant differences in major clinical outcomes between self-expanding versus balloon-expandable THV: MACCE (17.0% vs. 13.4%, adjusted-hazard ratios [HR] 1.18, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.82-1.69); all-cause death (11.4% vs. 9.3%, adjusted-HR 1.26; 95% CI: 0.78-2.05); cardiovascular death (8.5% vs. 4.0%, adjusted-HR 1.53; 95% CI: 0.82-2.86), any stroke (5.1% vs. 3.7%, adjusted-HR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.43-1.73); major or life-threatening bleeding (5.9% vs. 6.8%, adjusted-HR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.53-1.63). Clinical Trial Registration: . NCT02556203. Conclusions Two-year follow-up data from the GALILEO trial indicate that successful TAVI either with self-expanding or balloon-expandable THVs according to physician discretion did not show difference in rates of MACCE.
Notes: Windecker, S (corresponding author), Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
stephan.windecker@insel.ch
Keywords: aortic valve setenosis;balloon-expandable valve;GALILEO;major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events;self-expanding valve;successful implantation;transcatheter aortic valve implantation;transcatheter heart valve
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38065
ISSN: 1522-1946
e-ISSN: 1522-726X
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30370
ISI #: 000847465300001
Rights: 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2023
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.