Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38672
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGIL ULLDEMOLINS, Maria-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-29T14:12:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-29T14:12:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2022-09-28T11:42:23Z-
dc.identifier.citationIDEA (Perth), 18 (01) , p. 49 -64-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/38672-
dc.description.abstractThe 2020-21 pandemic threw many of us into a forced exploration of our domestic interiors. For some, the limited contact with the exterior world provoked a need for a refuge and escape: the recurrence of the interior eventually gave way to our interiorities. Looking for ways to simultaneously materialise and circumvent a spatial, intimate, and spiritual sense of self, this visual essay borrows the sumptuous patterns and textures of the interior in Kitagawa Utamaro’s 1788 erotic print, Lovers in an Upstairs Room (Figure 01). These, cut-out as inspired by the block-printing process, have been layered with my own absolutely mundane, domestic setting. At the same time, two fragmentary voices, one ekphrastic and one auto-theoretical, mirror the print and the graphic layering, creating a third text by overlapping. These voices host a multiplicity of others: from the mystical classic The Interior Castle, 1577, by the sickly, cloistered, Spanish nun Teresa of Ávila, which describes an ecstatic topography of the soul; to Canadian poet Lisa Robertson’s 2003 ‘Soft Architecture: A Manifesto,’ which calls for softness as a form of resistance; and for description as a mystical practice: ‘Practice description. Description is mystical.’01 Can the crash of voices, cultures, and imagery add up to one particular description? Can this description of one’s interiority at a very specific time build connections between tangible and immaterial, ordinary and extraordinary? Can there be a secular, soft topography of the self, of one’s interior castle, able to resist the advances of a hostile reality?-
dc.description.sponsorshipThere were several iterations with this piece, and I am seriously indebted to many for their feedback: Kris Pint, Nadia Sels, Patrícia Domingues, and Marta Gil Ulldemolins all made time to look at it and offer all sorts of assistance. The IDEA editors were exceptionally kind and attentive, and I am especially grateful to Julieanna Preston for all the time she poured into making this work better. I also want to put forward Tania Hershman’s endlessly inventive book and what if we were all allowed to disappear as an influence. If it did not exist, I do not think I would have created the text-couples in this essay-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherinteriority-
dc.subject.otherinterior-
dc.subject.otherdomesticity-
dc.subject.othershunga-
dc.subject.othersoft architecture-
dc.titleLovers in an Upstairs Room: A layered portrait of a soft interior(ity)-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage64-
dc.identifier.issue01-
dc.identifier.spage49-
dc.identifier.volume18-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.37113/ij.v18i01.416-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationGIL ULLDEMOLINS, Maria (2021) Lovers in an Upstairs Room: A layered portrait of a soft interior(ity). In: IDEA (Perth), 18 (01) , p. 49 -64.-
item.contributorGIL ULLDEMOLINS, Maria-
crisitem.journal.issn1445-5412-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
document.pdfPublished version16.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.