Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38740
Title: Cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to primary care for influenza-like-illness: economic evaluation alongside the randomised controlled ALIC(4)E trial in 15 European countries
Authors: Li, Xiao
Bilcke, Joke
van der Velden, Alike W.
BRUYNDONCKX, Robin 
Coenen , Samuel
Bongard, Emily
de Paor, Muirrean
Chlabicz, Slawomir
Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
Francis, Nick
Aabenhus, Rune
Bucher, Heiner C.
Colliers, Annelies
De Sutter, An
Garcia-Sangenis, Ana
Glinz, Dominik
Harbin, Nicolay J.
Kosiek, Katarzyna
Lindbaek, Morten
Lionis, Christos
Llor, Carl
Miko-Pauer, Reka
Jurgute, Ruta Radzeviciene
Seifert, Bohumil
Sundvall, Par-Daniel
Lundgren, Pia Touboul
Tsakountakis, Nikolaos
Verheij, Theo J.
Goossens, Herman
Butler, Christopher C.
Beutels, Philippe
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: SPRINGER
Source: European Journal of Health Economics,
Status: Early view
Abstract: Background Oseltamivir is usually not often prescribed (or reimbursed) for non-high-risk patients consulting for influenza-like-illness (ILI) in primary care in Europe. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to usual primary care in adults/adolescents (13 years +) and children with ILI during seasonal influenza epidemics, using data collected in an open-label, multi-season, randomised controlled trial of oseltamivir in 15 European countries. Methods Direct and indirect cost estimates were based on patient reported resource use and official country-specific unit costs. Health-Related Quality of Life was assessed by EQ-5D questionnaires. Costs and quality adjusted life-years (QALY) were bootstrapped (N = 10,000) to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), from both the healthcare payers' and the societal perspectives, with uncertainty expressed through probabilistic sensitivity analysis and expected value for perfect information (EVPI) analysis. Additionally, scenario (self-reported spending), comorbidities subgroup and country-specific analyses were performed. Results The healthcare payers' expected ICERs of oseltamivir were euro22,459 per QALY gained in adults/adolescents and euro13,001 in children. From the societal perspective, oseltamivir was cost-saving in adults/adolescents, but the ICER is euro8,344 in children. Large uncertainties were observed in subgroups with comorbidities, especially for children. The expected ICERs and extent of decision uncertainty varied between countries (EVPI ranged euro1-euro35 per patient). Conclusion Adding oseltamivir to primary usual care in Europe is likely to be cost-effective for treating adults/adolescents and children with ILI from the healthcare payers' perspective (if willingness-to-pay per QALY gained > euro22,459) and cost-saving in adults/adolescents from a societal perspective.
Notes: Li, X (corresponding author), Univ Antwerp, Ctr Hlth Econ Res & Modelling Infect Dis CHERMID, Vaccine & Infect Dis Inst VAXINFECTIO, Campus Drie Eiken,Room DS-221,Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
xiao.li@uantwerpen.be; joke.bilcke@uantwerpen.be;
A.W.vanderVelden@umcutrecht.nl; robin.bruyndonckx@uhasselt.be;
samuel.coenen@uantwerpen.be; emily.bongard@phc.ox.ac.uk;
muireanndepaor@rcsi.ie; chlabiczs@gmail.com;
maciej.godycki-cwirko@umed.lodz.pl; Nick.Francis@soton.ac.uk;
runa@sund.ku.dk; Heiner.Bucher@usb.ch; annelies.colliers@uantwerpen.be;
An.DeSutter@UGent.be; agarcia@idiapjgol.org; dominik.glinz@usb.ch;
n.j.harbin@medisin.uio.no; kasia@uni.lodz.pl;
morten.lindbak@medisin.uio.no; lionis@uoc.gr; cllor@health.sdu.dk;
reka.pauer@drc.hu; seimosgyd@gmail.com; bohumil.seifert@lf1.cuni.cz;
par-daniel.sundvall@vgregion.se; touboul.p@chu-nice.fr;
drtsakou@yahoo.gr; T.J.M.Verheij-3@umcutrecht.nl;
Herman.Goossens@uza.be; christopher.butler@phc.ox.ac.uk;
philippe.beutels@uantwerpen.be
Keywords: Tamiflu;Cost-utility analysis;Europe;Multi-country;QALY;ILI;Direct cost;Indirect cost;Productivity losses
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38740
ISSN: 1618-7598
e-ISSN: 1618-7601
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01521-2
ISI #: 000857456500001
Rights: The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2023
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.