Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38803
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, Kerry L. M.-
dc.contributor.authorGimma, Amy-
dc.contributor.authorPaixao, Enny S.-
dc.contributor.authorFAES, Christel-
dc.contributor.authorBeutels, Philippe-
dc.contributor.authorHENS, Niel-
dc.contributor.authorJarvis, Christopher I.-
dc.contributor.authorEdmunds, W. John-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-24T10:48:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-24T10:48:10Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.date.submitted2022-10-20T13:13:07Z-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22 (1) (Art N° 757)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/38803-
dc.description.abstractBackground Evidence and advice for pregnant women evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic. We studied social contact behaviour and vaccine uptake in pregnant women between March 2020 and September 2021 in 19 European countries. Methods In each country, repeated online survey data were collected from a panel of nationally-representative participants. We calculated the adjusted mean number of contacts reported with an individual-level generalized additive mixed model, modelled using the negative binomial distribution and a log link function. Mean proportion of people in isolation or quarantine, and vaccination coverage by pregnancy status and gender were calculated using a clustered bootstrap. Findings We recorded 4,129 observations from 1,041 pregnant women, and 115,359 observations from 29,860 non-pregnant individuals aged 18-49. Pregnant women made slightly fewer contacts (3.6, 95%CI = 3.5-3.7) than non-pregnant women (4.0, 95%CI = 3.9-4.0), driven by fewer work contacts but marginally more contacts in non-essential social settings. Approximately 15-20% pregnant and 5% of non-pregnant individuals reported to be in isolation and quarantine for large parts of the study period. COVID-19 vaccine coverage was higher in pregnant women than in non-pregnant women between January and April 2021. Since May 2021, vaccination in non-pregnant women began to increase and surpassed that in pregnant women. Interpretation Limited social contact to avoid pathogen exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic has been a challenge to many, especially women going through pregnancy. More recognition of maternal social support desire is needed in the ongoing pandemic. As COVID-19 vaccination continues to remain an important pillar of outbreak response, strategies to promote correct information can provide reassurance and facilitate informed pregnancy vaccine decisions in this vulnerable group.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe following funding sources are acknowledged as providing funding for the named authors. HPRU in Modelling & Health Economics,NIHR200908,European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme,EpiPose 101003688,TransMID 682540,TransMID 682540,TransMID 682540,EpiPose 101003688,Wellcome Trust,213589/Z/18/Z,National Institute for Health Research,CV220-088—COMIX,CV220-088—COMIX,CV220-088— COMIX,Global Challenges Research Fund,ES/P010873/1,Medical Research Council,MC_PC_19065,NIHR,PR-OD-1017-20002 HPRU in Modelling & Health Economics (NIHR200908: KLMW); European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme – (EpiPose 101,003,688: AG, WJE). Wellcome Trust (213,589/Z/18/Z: ESP). European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (TransMID 682,540: CF, PN, NH). This research was partly funded by the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) project RECAP managed through RCUK and ESRC (ES/P010873/1: CIJ). NIHR (PR-OD-1017–20,002: WJE) UK MRC (MC_PC_19065—Covid 19: Understanding the dynamics and drivers of the COVID-19 epidemic using real-time outbreak analytics: WJE). The funders had no role in study design, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBMC-
dc.rightsThe Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativeco mmons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data-
dc.subject.otherPregnancy-
dc.subject.otherCOVID-19-
dc.subject.otherContact survey-
dc.subject.otherSocial contact-
dc.subject.otherLockdowns-
dc.subject.otherEurope-
dc.titlePregnancy during COVID-19: social contact patterns and vaccine coverage of pregnant women from CoMix in 19 European countries-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.volume22-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesWong, KLM (corresponding author), London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, England.-
dc.description.notesKerry.wong@lshtm.ac.uk-
local.publisher.placeCAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr757-
local.type.programmeH2020-
local.relation.h2020101003688-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12884-022-05076-1-
dc.identifier.pmid36209078-
dc.identifier.isi000865179400004-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Wong, Kerry L. M.; Gimma, Amy; Paixao, Enny S.; Jarvis, Christopher I.; Edmunds, W. John; CoMix Europe Working Grp] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, England.-
local.description.affiliation[Faes, Christel; Hens, Niel] Hasselt Univ, Data Sci Inst & BioStat, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Faes, Christel; Hens, Niel] Univ Antwerp, Vaccine & Infect Dis Inst, Ctr Hlth Econ Res & Modelling Infect Dis, Antwerp, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorWong, Kerry L. M.-
item.contributorGimma, Amy-
item.contributorPaixao, Enny S.-
item.contributorFAES, Christel-
item.contributorBeutels, Philippe-
item.contributorHENS, Niel-
item.contributorJarvis, Christopher I.-
item.contributorEdmunds, W. John-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationWong, Kerry L. M.; Gimma, Amy; Paixao, Enny S.; FAES, Christel; Beutels, Philippe; HENS, Niel; Jarvis, Christopher I. & Edmunds, W. John (2022) Pregnancy during COVID-19: social contact patterns and vaccine coverage of pregnant women from CoMix in 19 European countries. In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22 (1) (Art N° 757).-
item.validationecoom 2023-
crisitem.journal.eissn1471-2393-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.