Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/39308
Title: Win statistics (win ratio, win odds, and net benefit) can complement one another to show the strength of the treatment effect on time-to-event outcomes
Authors: Dong, Gaohong
Huang, Bo
VERBEECK, Johan 
Cui, Ying
Song, James
Gamalo‐siebers, Margaret
Wang, Duolao
Hoaglin, David
Seifu, Yodit
Mütze, Tobias
Kolassa, John
Issue Date: 2023
Publisher: 
Source: PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 22 (1) , p. 20 -33
Abstract: Conventional analyses of a composite of multiple time-to-event outcomes use the time to the first event. However, the first event may not be the most important outcome. To address this limitation, generalized pairwise comparisons and win statistics (win ratio, win odds, and net benefit) have become popular and have been applied to clinical trial practice. However, win ratio, win odds, and net benefit have typically been used separately. In this article, we examine the use of these three win statistics jointly for time-to-event outcomes. First, we explain the relation of point estimates and variances among the three win statistics, and the relation between the net benefit and the Mann-Whitney U statistic. Then we explain that the three win statistics are based on the same win proportions, and they test the same null hypothesis of equal win probabilities in two groups. We show theoretically that the Z-values of the corresponding statistical tests are approximately equal; therefore, the three win statistics provide very similar p-values and statistical powers. Finally, using simulation studies and data from a clinical trial, we demonstrate that, when there is no (or little) censoring, the three win statistics can complement one another to show the strength of the treatment effect. However, when the amount of censor-ing is not small, and without adjustment for censoring, the win odds and the net benefit may have an advantage for interpreting the treatment effect; with adjustment (e.g., IPCW adjustment) for censoring, the three win statistics can complement one another to show the strength of the treatment effect. For calculations we use the R package WINS, available on the CRAN (Comprehensive R Archive Network). K E Y W O R D S IPCW, IPCW-adjusted win statistics, inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting, generalized pairwise comparisons, Mann-Whitney U statistic
Keywords: IPCW;IPCW-adjusted win statistics;inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting;generalized pairwise comparisons;Mann-Whitney U statistic
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/39308
ISSN: 1539-1604
e-ISSN: 1539-1612
DOI: 10.1002/pst.2251
ISI #: WOS:000815857300001
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2023
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dong_2022_Win statistics_complementary.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Pharmaceutical Statistics-Win statistics can complement one another.pdfPeer-reviewed author version592.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on May 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.