Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/39590
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBruggeman, B-
dc.contributor.authorHidding, K-
dc.contributor.authorSTRUYVEN, Katrien-
dc.contributor.authorPynoo, B-
dc.contributor.authorGarone, A-
dc.contributor.authorTondeur, J-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T12:55:28Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-27T12:55:28Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.date.submitted2023-02-27T12:53:53Z-
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (2) , p. 98 -112-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/39590-
dc.description.abstractTeachers' beliefs about education influence practice and vice versa. Teacher educators should be particularly attuned to the association between educational beliefs and practice. Teachers' beliefs about education have been widely studied, but investigating how a team of teacher educators put a shared vision on blended learning into practice is less researched. Blended learning practices are subject to the four design aspects of incorporating flexibility, stimulating interaction, facilitating the learning process, and creating an affective learning climate. This qualitative study investigates a team of experienced blended learning teacher educators from two perspectives: their beliefs about blended learning, and how these beliefs are realised in practice. Seventeen screencast stimulated recall interviews revealed: (1) teacher educators express evaluative beliefs about deep and meaningful blended learning and descriptive beliefs about online flexibility and face-to-face interaction, and (2) how these beliefs are realised in practice by flexible online facilitation of learning processes, profound face-to-face interaction, and providing authentic learning experiences. Furthermore, as a result of the association between beliefs about blended learning and practice, the areas of refining student feedback, improving online structure and increasing interaction in online learning materials emerged for professional growth. Finally, recommendations are made for blended learning practitioners and teacher educators.Implications for practice or policy:Teacher educators hold evaluative beliefs about deep and meaningful blended learning and descriptive beliefs about online flexibility and face-to-face interaction.Deep and meaningful blended learning is promoted by flexible online facilitation of learning processes, profound face-to-face interaction, and providing authentic learning experiences.Areas for professional growth are refining student feedback, improving online structure and increasing interaction in online learning materials.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAUSTRALASIAN SOC COMPUTERS LEARNING TERTIARY EDUCATION-ASCILITE-
dc.rightsArticles published in the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NCND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant AJET right of first publication under CC BYNC-ND 4.0.-
dc.subject.otherblended learning-
dc.subject.otherprofessional growth-
dc.subject.otherscreencast stimulated recall-
dc.subject.otherteacher beliefs-
dc.subject.otheruniversity teacher education-
dc.titleNegotiating teacher educators' beliefs about blended learning: Using stimulated recall to explore design choices-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage112-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage98-
dc.identifier.volume38-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.placeUNIT 5, 202 COODE ST, PO BOX 350, TUGUN, 4224, AUSTRALIA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.14742/ajet.7175-
dc.identifier.isi000812311800007-
local.provider.typeWeb of Science-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fullcitationBruggeman, B; Hidding, K; STRUYVEN, Katrien; Pynoo, B; Garone, A & Tondeur, J (2022) Negotiating teacher educators' beliefs about blended learning: Using stimulated recall to explore design choices. In: Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (2) , p. 98 -112.-
item.validationecoom 2023-
item.contributorBruggeman, B-
item.contributorHidding, K-
item.contributorSTRUYVEN, Katrien-
item.contributorPynoo, B-
item.contributorGarone, A-
item.contributorTondeur, J-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn1449-3098-
crisitem.journal.eissn1449-5554-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
document.pdfPublished version441.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on Jul 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.