Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/39647
Title: Natural and miscellaneous agents for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: ROBIJNS, Jolien 
Becherini, Carlotta
Caini, Saverio
Wolf, Julie Ryan
van den Hurk, Corina
Beveridge, Mara
Lam, Henry
Bonomo, Pierluigi
Chow, Edward
Behroozian, Tara
Issue Date: 2023
Publisher: 
Source: SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 31 (3)
Status: In press
Abstract: Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the available literature describing the efficacy of natural and miscellaneous agents in preventing acute radiation dermatitis (RD) in cancer patients. Methods OVID MedLine, Embase, and Cochrane literature databases were searched from 1946 to January 2023 for randomized controlled trials studying the use of natural and miscellaneous agents to prevent RD. RevMan 5.4 was used for the meta-analysis to calculate the pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random effects analysis. Results For the systematic review and meta-analysis, 19 and 16 studies were included, respectively. Of the five studied natural products (aloe vera, oral enzymes, olive oil, calendula, and curcumin), only oral enzymes and olive oil significantly reduced the incidence of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 2+ (RR: 0.42, 95%CI 0.30–0.58, p < 0.00001, RR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.51–0.85, p = 0.001, resp.). The oral enzymes also reduced the grade 3+ RD incidence (RR: 0.18, 95%CI 0.06–0.55, p = 0.003). The other agents demonstrated no significant effect. Conclusion This review and meta-analysis on natural and miscellaneous agents in preventing RD in cancer patients demonstrated that oral enzymes and olive oil prevented RD severity. However, evidence supporting natural agents to prevent RD is inconsistent, mainly because of low studies numbers, low-quality study designs, and small sample sizes. Therefore, concrete conclusions cannot be made. Research on (new) natural or miscellaneous agents should focus on a randomized controlled double-blinded study design with a large patient population, a higher consistency in research methods, and clinician- and patient-reported outcomes.
Keywords: Acute radiation dermatitis;Radiotherapy;Meta-analysis;Natural agents;Skin toxicity;Systematic review
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/39647
ISSN: 0941-4355
e-ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07656-z
Rights: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Robijns_2023_Meta-Analysis_ARD_MASCC.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version3.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.