Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/39843
Title: General practitioners' perceptions on opportunistic single-time point screening for atrial fibrillation: A European quantitative survey
Authors: Vermunicht, Paulien
Grecu, Mihaela
Deharo, Jean-Claude
Buckley, Claire M.
Pala, Elena
Mairesse, Georges H.
Farkowski, Michal M.
Bergonti, Marco
Puererfellner, Helmut
Hanson, Coral L.
Neubeck, Lis
Freedman, Ben
Witt, Henning
Hills, Mellanie T.
Lund, Jenny
Giskes, Katrina
Engler, Daniel
Schnabel, Renate B.
HEIDBUCHEL, Hein 
DESTEGHE, Lien 
AFFECT-EU investigators
Issue Date: 2023
Publisher: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Source: Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10 (Art N° 1112561)
Abstract: BackgroundThere is no clear guidance on how to implement opportunistic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening in daily clinical practice. ObjectivesThis study evaluated the perception of general practitioners (GPs) about value and practicalities of implementing screening for AF, focusing on opportunistic single-time point screening with a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) device. MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with a survey developed to assess overall perception concerning AF screening, feasibility of opportunistic single-lead ECG screening and implementation requirements and barriers. ResultsA total of 659 responses were collected (36.1% Eastern, 33.4% Western, 12.1% Southern, 10.0% Northern Europe, 8.3% United Kingdom & Ireland). The perceived need for standardized AF screening was rated as 82.7 on a scale from 0 to 100. The vast majority (88.0%) indicated no AF screening program is established in their region. Three out of four GPs (72.1%, lowest in Eastern and Southern Europe) were equipped with a 12-lead ECG, while a single-lead ECG was less common (10.8%, highest in United Kingdom & Ireland). Three in five GPs (59.3%) feel confident ruling out AF on a single-lead ECG strip. Assistance through more education (28.7%) and a tele-healthcare service offering advice on ambiguous tracings (25.2%) would be helpful. Preferred strategies to overcome barriers like insufficient (qualified) staff, included integrating AF screening with other healthcare programs (24.9%) and algorithms to identify patients most suitable for AF screening (24.3%). ConclusionGPs perceive a strong need for a standardized AF screening approach. Additional resources may be required to have it widely adopted into clinical practice.
Notes: Vermunicht, P (corresponding author), Antwerp Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Antwerp, Belgium.; Vermunicht, P (corresponding author), Univ Antwerp, Res Grp Cardiovasc Dis, Antwerp, Belgium.
Paulien.Vermunicht@uantwerpen.be
Keywords: atrial fibrillation;screening;AFFECT-EU;survey;general practitioners
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/39843
ISSN: 2297-055X
e-ISSN: 2297-055X
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1112561
ISI #: 000940128600001
Rights: 2023 Vermunicht, Grecu, Deharo, Buckley, Palà, Mairesse, Farkowski, Bergonti, Pürerfellner, Hanson, Neubeck, Freedman, Witt, Hills, Lund, Giskes, Engler, Schnabel, Heidbuchel, Desteghe and for the AFFECT-EU investigators. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.