Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/39921
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDE SCHEPPER, David-
dc.contributor.authorMELNIKOV, Anton-
dc.contributor.authorSIMONS, Mattias-
dc.contributor.authorBRABANTS, Lowie-
dc.contributor.authorSCHROEYERS, Wouter-
dc.contributor.authorDemeester, Eric-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T09:04:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-12T09:04:29Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.date.submitted2023-03-29T13:12:20Z-
dc.identifier.citation-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/39921-
dc.description.abstractOver the past years, automated, robotic radiation source localisation has become of emerging interest due to a variety of reasons, e.g. disaster response, homeland security, or dismantling and decommissioning of nuclear contaminated areas. Nowadays, to perform in-the-field measurements, radiation protection officers are tasked with characterising an environment before dismantling and decommissioning can take place. This is challenging because of the absence of a priori information on the potentially contaminated area. Besides the health risks involved, this preparatory task is very time-consuming and prone to errors concerning the taken measurements and the post-processing of these measurements. To further automate this key preliminary task, this paper presents two search algorithms to localise multiple radiological point sources in the environment: a passive localisation algorithm where a robotic platform scans a surface using a predefined pattern, and an active source localisation algorithm that chooses the next best position to take a measurement in order to characterise an environment. The developed approaches are first tested in a simulation environment and then validated using in-situ laboratory measurements using a Kromek CZT sensor and a two-dimensional linear guidance system. The experiments show that a correct representation of the environment is contained both for the passive and active localisation approach. Furthermore, the active localisation approach demonstrates that a large reduction in the amount of measurements to char-acterise an environment can be obtained without compromising on the estimation accuracy.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleDesign and Comparison of a Passive and Active Multiple Radiological Point Source Localisation Algorithm-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate23/10/2022-28/10/2022-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameIROS 2022 Workshop on Robotics for Nuclear Environments Exploration and Decommissioning: Challenges and Emerging Techniques-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplace(Kyoto), Japan-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC2-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.robot.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Robotics_for_nuclear_environments/David_De_Schepper.pdf-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationDE SCHEPPER, David; MELNIKOV, Anton; SIMONS, Mattias; BRABANTS, Lowie; SCHROEYERS, Wouter & Demeester, Eric (2022) Design and Comparison of a Passive and Active Multiple Radiological Point Source Localisation Algorithm.-
item.contributorDE SCHEPPER, David-
item.contributorMELNIKOV, Anton-
item.contributorSIMONS, Mattias-
item.contributorBRABANTS, Lowie-
item.contributorSCHROEYERS, Wouter-
item.contributorDemeester, Eric-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
David_De_Schepper.pdfPublished version1.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.