Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/40260
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsoumanis, Achilleas-
dc.contributor.authorVan Dijck, Christophe-
dc.contributor.authorHENS, Niel-
dc.contributor.authorKenyon, Chris-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-01T13:08:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-01T13:08:29Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-05-31T11:14:38Z-
dc.identifier.citationOpen Forum Infectious Diseases, 10 (4) (Art N° ofad165)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/40260-
dc.description.abstractBackground Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) has developed antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to multiple classes of antibiotics. While treatment of symptomatic NG in groups, such as men who have sex with men (MSM), is crucial, screening programs targeting asymptomatic NG cases may contribute to excessive antibiotic exposure of the population and thus to the emergence of gonococcal AMR. Our primary aim was to assess if intense screening could promote AMR in NG. Methods We built a network-based model of NG transmission dynamics among MSM in Belgium to estimate the prevalence of NG in the population and the risk of AMR. The model simulates daily transmission of NG among 3 anatomical sites in a population of 10 000 MSM, grouped as low risk or high risk, over 10 years. The effect of group-wise variation in treatment efficacy levels and screening intensities on NG prevalence and cumulative risk of AMR emergence was evaluated. Results Increasing screening intensity in the low-risk MSM had little effect on NG prevalence. An inverse correlation between screening intensity in the high-risk group and both NG prevalence and the risk for azithromycin resistance was observed, irrespective of the screening intensity in the low-risk group. High-risk MSM were at higher risk for azithromycin-resistant NG in all screening intensity and treatment efficacy scenarios, compared to low-risk MSM. Conclusions Our results suggest that intensive screening in the low-risk population has little impact on prevalence but may increase the probability of AMR emerging. In contrast, intensive screening in the high-risk population reduces both the prevalence of NG and macrolide resistance. Screening for gonorrhea decreases the prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae; however, screening among low-risk men who have sex with men has little effect on gonorrhea prevalence. Intensive screening in the high-risk population reduces both the prevalence of N gonorrhoeae and macrolide resistance.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank Jozefien Buyze for the insights into the initial conception of the model and Lander Willem for critical assistance during the model calibration.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS INC-
dc.rightsThe Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited.-
dc.subject.otherantimicrobial resistance-
dc.subject.othermathematical model-
dc.subject.othermen who have sex with men-
dc.subject.otherNeisseria gonorrhoeae-
dc.titleRethinking Screening Intensity in Terms of Reducing Prevalence or Increasing Selection Pressure for the Emergence of Resistant Gonorrhea: A Modeling Study of Men Who Have Sex With Men in Belgium-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.volume10-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesTsoumanis, A; Kenyon, C (corresponding author), Inst Trop Med Antwerp, Nationalestr 155, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium.-
dc.description.notesatsoumanis@itg.be; ckenyon@itg.be-
local.publisher.placeJOURNALS DEPT, 2001 EVANS RD, CARY, NC 27513 USA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnrofad165-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ofid/ofad165-
dc.identifier.pmid37125235-
dc.identifier.isi000977348900005-
dc.contributor.orcidVan Dijck, Christophe/0000-0001-8010-1351-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Tsoumanis, Achilleas; Van Dijck, Christophe; Kenyon, Chris] Inst Trop Med Antwerp, Dept Clin Sci, Antwerp, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Tsoumanis, Achilleas; Hens, Niel] Univ Antwerp, Vaccine & Infect Dis Inst, Ctr Hlth Econ Res & Modelling Infect Dis, Antwerp, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Van Dijck, Christophe] Univ Antwerp, Lab Med Microbiol, Antwerp, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Hens, Niel] Hasselt Univ, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat, Data Sci Inst, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Kenyon, Chris] Univ Cape Town, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis & HIV Med, Cape Town, South Africa.-
local.description.affiliation[Tsoumanis, Achilleas; Kenyon, Chris] Inst Trop Med Antwerp, Nationalestr 155, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationTsoumanis, Achilleas; Van Dijck, Christophe; HENS, Niel & Kenyon, Chris (2023) Rethinking Screening Intensity in Terms of Reducing Prevalence or Increasing Selection Pressure for the Emergence of Resistant Gonorrhea: A Modeling Study of Men Who Have Sex With Men in Belgium. In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 10 (4) (Art N° ofad165).-
item.contributorTsoumanis, Achilleas-
item.contributorVan Dijck, Christophe-
item.contributorHENS, Niel-
item.contributorKenyon, Chris-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn2328-8957-
crisitem.journal.eissn2328-8957-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.