Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/40547
Title: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation to Support COVID-19 Patients: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study
Authors: STESSEL, Bjorn 
Bin Saad, Maayeen
Ullrick, Lotte
Geebelen, Laurien
Lehaen, Jeroen
Van Tornout, Michiel
TIMMERMANS, Philippe 
CALLEBAUT, Ina 
Dubois, Jasperina
VANDENBRANDE, Jeroen 
Editors: Tran, Quincy K.
Issue Date: 2023
Publisher: 
Source: Critical Care Research and Practice, 2023 (Art N° ID 5101456)
Abstract: Background. In patients with severe respiratory failure from COVID-19, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatment can facilitate lung-protective ventilation and may improve outcome and survival if conventional therapy fails to assure adequate oxygenation and ventilation. We aimed to perform a confrmatory propensity-matched cohort study comparing the impact of ECMO and maximum invasive mechanical ventilation alone (MVA) on mortality and complications in severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Materials and Methods. All 295 consecutive adult patients with confrmed COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from March 13th, 2020, to July 31st, 2021 were included. At admission, all patients were classifed into 3 categories: (1) full code including the initiation of ECMO therapy (AAA code), (2) full code excluding ECMO (AA code), and (3) do-not-intubate (A code). For the 271 non-ECMO patients, match eligibility was determined for all patients with the AAA code treated with MVA. Propensity score matching was performed using a logistic regression model including the following variables: gender, P/F ratio, SOFA score at admission, and date of ICU admission. Te primary endpoint was ICU mortality. Results. A total of 24 ECMO patients were propensity matched to an equal number of MVA patients. ICU mortality was signifcantly higher in the ECMO arm (45.8%) compared with the MVA cohort (16.67%) (OR 4.23 (1.11, 16.17); p � 0.02). Treemonth mortality was 50% with ECMO compared to 16.67% after MVA (OR 5.91 (1.55, 22.58); p < 0.01). Applied peak inspiratory pressures (33.42 ± 8.52 vs. 24.74 ± 4.86 mmHg; p < 0.01) and maximal PEEP levels (14.47 ± 3.22 vs. 13.52 ± 3.86 mmHg; p � 0.01) were higher with MVA. ICU length of stay (LOS) and hospital LOS were comparable in both groups. Conclusion. ECMO therapy may be associated with an up to a three-fold increase in ICU mortality and 3-month mortality compared to MVA despite the facilitation of lung-protective ventilation settings in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. We cannot confrm the positive results of the frst propensity-matched cohort study on this topic. Tis trial is registered with NCT05158816.
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/40547
ISSN: 2090-1305
e-ISSN: 2090-1313
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5101456
ISI #: 001019717800001
Rights: 2023 Bjorn Stessel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CCRP5101456 1..10.pdfPublished version303.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.