Best practice rehabilitation pathway for the management of single and double-level lumbar fusion surgery: a modified Delphi Study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence to guide the rehabilitation of patients following single or double-level lumbar fusion surgery (LFS). This is reflected in extensive variability in current rehabilitation regimes and subsequent low clinical success rates, which urges a call for a consensus rehabilitation pathway.AIM: To establish consensus on the optimal pre-, peri-and postoperative rehabilitation of LFS.DESIGN: A modified Delphi Study.SETTING: Belgium and the Netherlands.POPULATION: A multidisciplinary panel of 31 experts in the field of LFS and rehabilitation participated. Nine patients validated the consensus pathway.METHODS: A three-round online Delphi questionnaire was followed by an in-person consensus meeting. In each round, experts could suggest new statements, and received group summary statistics and feedback for reconsidered statements. Consensus threshold was set at >75% agree-ment. The resulting rehabilitation pathway was validated by patients through an online questionnaire and subsequent in-person focus group.RESULTS: A total of 31 experts participated in the first online round, with 27 (87%) completing all online rounds, and 17 (55%) attending the in-person consensus meeting. Consensus was reached on 122 statements relating to pre-, peri-and postoperative rehabilitation of LFS, and validated by patients. Key components of the rehabilitation pathway included prehabilitation, education, physiotherapy in every phase, early postoperative mobilization, and little movement restrictions. Patients emphasized the need for support during the return-to-work process.CONCLUSIONS: This process resulted in 122 expert-consensus statements on best practice rehabilitation for managing LFS, validated by patients.CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The proposed rehabilitation pathway can serve as guidance to support clinicians, reduce practice variability, and subsequently improve clinical outcomes after LFS.