Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/40722
Title: Biolimus-eluting vs. other limus-eluting stents in NSTE-ACS: A pooled analysis of GLASSY and TWILIGHT
Authors: Spirito, Alessandro
Valgimigli, Marco
Cao, Davide
Baber, Usman
Mehta, Shamir R.
Gibson, C. Michael
Steg, Gabriel P.
Sharma, Samin K.
Goel, Ridhima
Huber, Kurt
Kunadian, Vijay
Escaned, Javier
Franzone, Anna
Yaling, Han
Collier, Timothy
Kaul, Upendra
Kornowski, Ran
Krucoff, Mitchell
Moliterno, David
Sartori, Samantha
Owen, Ruth
Zhang, Zhongjie
Dangas, George D.
Kastrati, Adnan
Angiolillo, Dominick J.
Cohen, David J.
VRANCKX, Pascal 
Windecker, Stephan
Pocock, Stuart
Mehran, Roxana
Issue Date: 2023
Publisher: ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
Source: International Journal of Cardiology, 383 , p. 24 -32
Abstract: Background: Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) may be associated with better outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to other current-generation limus-eluting stents (LES). Aims: To compare BP-BES with other current-generation LES in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Methods: We pooled individual data of Non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE)-ACS patients from two large ran-domized controlled trials (GLASSY and TWILIGHT). The BP-BES groups consisted mostly of GLASSY patients, while the control group (other current-generation LES) included exclusively TWILIGHT patients. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarc-tion, or stent thrombosis; the key secondary outcome was target-vessel failure (TVF). To account for trial design differences, outcomes were assessed at 3 months (short-term) and between 3 and 12 months (long-term) after PCI and subsequently pooled to estimate the 12-month hazards. Results: Of 7107 and 6053 NSTE-ACS patients included in the short-and long-term analysis, 32.7% and 36.5% received a BP-BES, respectively. Risk of MACE associated with BP-BES versus other LES was similar at short-term (1.1% vs 1.3%, adjusted HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.53-1.38), lower at long-term (1.7% vs 3.1%, adjusted HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.72), and lower in the entire 12-month period (pooled adjusted HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.45-0.82). The cu-mulative 12-month risk of TVF was reduced with BP-BES (adjusted HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.38-0.70). Conclusion: BP-BES was associated with lower 12-month risks of MACE and TVF compared to other current generation LES among NSTE-ACS patients treated with abbreviated or standard ticagrelor-based DAPT. These non-randomized findings are hypothesis-generating. Condensed abstract: Differences in clinical outcomes may exist between biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) and other current-generation limus-eluting stent (LES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We pooled individual data of about 7000 Non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients undergoing PCI and treated with ticagrelor with or without aspirin from two large randomized controlled trials (GLASSY and TWI-LIGHT). BP-BES patients derived very largely from GLASSY and other LES patients from TWILIGHT. In this population, BP-BES compared to other current generation LES, were associated with a lower 12-month risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and target-vessel failure.
Notes: Mehran, R (corresponding author), Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Med, 1 Gustav L Levy Place,Box 1030, New York, NY 10029 USA.
roxana.mehran@mountsinai.org
Keywords: Biolimus eluting stent;Biodegradable polymer;Ticagrelor;Percutaneous coronary intervention Outcomes
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/40722
ISSN: 0167-5273
e-ISSN: 1874-1754
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.027
ISI #: 001015183000001
Rights: 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Biolimus-eluting vs. other limus-eluting stents in NSTE-ACS_ A pooled analysis of GLASSY and TWILIGHT.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2.86 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Biolimus-eluting vs. other limus-eluting stents.pdf
  Until 2024-07-15
Peer-reviewed author version992.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.