Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/42102
Title: | Bintrafusp Alfa Versus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Treatment-Naive, Programmed Death-Ligand 1-High Advanced NSCLC: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial | Authors: | Cho, Byoung Chul Lee, Jong Seok Wu , Yi-Long Cicin, Irfan Dols, Manuel Cobo Ahn, Myung-Ju CUPPENS, Kristof Veillon, Remi Nadal, Ernest Dias, Josiane Mourao Martin, Claudio Reck, Martin Garon, Edward B. Felip, Enriqueta Paz-Ares, Luis Mornex, Francoise Vokes, Everett E. Adjei, Alex A. Robinson, Clifford Sato, Masashi Vugmeyster, Yulia Machl, Andreas Audhuy, Francois Chaudhary, Surendra Barlesi, Fabrice |
Issue Date: | 2023 | Publisher: | ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC | Source: | Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 18 (12) , p. 1731 -1742 | Abstract: | Introduction: Bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-bRII (a TGF-b "trap") fused to a human immuno-globulin G1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has exhibited clinical activity in a phase 1 expansion cohort of patients with PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC. Methods: This adaptive phase 3 trial (NCT03631706) compared the efficacy and safety of bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in patients with PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC. Primary end points were progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 per independent review committee and overall survival. Results: Patients (N = 304) were randomized one-to-one to receive either bintrafusp alfa or pembrolizumab (n = 152 each). The median follow-up was 14.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.1-16.0 mo) for bintrafusp alfa and 14.5 months (95% CI: 13.1-15.9 mo) for pem-brolizumab. Progression-free survival by independent re-view committee was not significantly different between bintrafusp alfa and pembrolizumab arms (median = 7.0 mo [95% CI: 4.2 mo-not reached (NR)] versus 11.1 mo [95% CI: 8.1 mo-NR]; hazard ratio = 1.232 [95% CI: 0.885- 1.714]). The median overall survival was 21.1 months (95% CI: 21.1 mo-NR) for bintrafusp alfa and 22.1 months (95% CI: 20.4 mo-NR) for pembrolizumab (hazard ratio = 1.201 [95% CI: 0.796-1.811]). Treatment-related adverse events were higher with bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab; grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42.4% versus 13.2% of patients, respectively. The study was discontinued at an interim analysis as it was unlikely to meet the primary end point. Conclusions: First-line treatment with bintrafusp alfa did not exhibit superior efficacy compared with pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-high, advanced NSCLC.(c) 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/). | Notes: | Barlesi, F (corresponding author), Hop St Marguerite, Federat Malad Respiratoires, Serv Oncol Thorac, 270,Bd St Marguerite, F-13274 Marseille 09, France. fabrice.barlesi@gustaveroussy.fr |
Keywords: | Bintrafusp alfa;Phase 3;NSCLC;PD-L1 | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/42102 | ISSN: | 1556-0864 | e-ISSN: | 1556-1380 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.08.018 | ISI #: | 001129725400001 | Rights: | 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Show full item record
SCOPUSTM
Citations
38
checked on Aug 23, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
36
checked on Aug 25, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.