Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/42102
Title: Bintrafusp Alfa Versus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Treatment-Naive, Programmed Death-Ligand 1-High Advanced NSCLC: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial
Authors: Cho, Byoung Chul
Lee, Jong Seok
Wu , Yi-Long
Cicin, Irfan
Dols, Manuel Cobo
Ahn, Myung-Ju
CUPPENS, Kristof 
Veillon, Remi
Nadal, Ernest
Dias, Josiane Mourao
Martin, Claudio
Reck, Martin
Garon, Edward B.
Felip, Enriqueta
Paz-Ares, Luis
Mornex, Francoise
Vokes, Everett E.
Adjei, Alex A.
Robinson, Clifford
Sato, Masashi
Vugmeyster, Yulia
Machl, Andreas
Audhuy, Francois
Chaudhary, Surendra
Barlesi, Fabrice
Issue Date: 2023
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Source: Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 18 (12) , p. 1731 -1742
Abstract: Introduction: Bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-bRII (a TGF-b "trap") fused to a human immuno-globulin G1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has exhibited clinical activity in a phase 1 expansion cohort of patients with PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC. Methods: This adaptive phase 3 trial (NCT03631706) compared the efficacy and safety of bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in patients with PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC. Primary end points were progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 per independent review committee and overall survival. Results: Patients (N = 304) were randomized one-to-one to receive either bintrafusp alfa or pembrolizumab (n = 152 each). The median follow-up was 14.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.1-16.0 mo) for bintrafusp alfa and 14.5 months (95% CI: 13.1-15.9 mo) for pem-brolizumab. Progression-free survival by independent re-view committee was not significantly different between bintrafusp alfa and pembrolizumab arms (median = 7.0 mo [95% CI: 4.2 mo-not reached (NR)] versus 11.1 mo [95% CI: 8.1 mo-NR]; hazard ratio = 1.232 [95% CI: 0.885- 1.714]). The median overall survival was 21.1 months (95% CI: 21.1 mo-NR) for bintrafusp alfa and 22.1 months (95% CI: 20.4 mo-NR) for pembrolizumab (hazard ratio = 1.201 [95% CI: 0.796-1.811]). Treatment-related adverse events were higher with bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab; grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42.4% versus 13.2% of patients, respectively. The study was discontinued at an interim analysis as it was unlikely to meet the primary end point. Conclusions: First-line treatment with bintrafusp alfa did not exhibit superior efficacy compared with pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-high, advanced NSCLC.(c) 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Notes: Barlesi, F (corresponding author), Hop St Marguerite, Federat Malad Respiratoires, Serv Oncol Thorac, 270,Bd St Marguerite, F-13274 Marseille 09, France.
fabrice.barlesi@gustaveroussy.fr
Keywords: Bintrafusp alfa;Phase 3;NSCLC;PD-L1
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/42102
ISSN: 1556-0864
e-ISSN: 1556-1380
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.08.018
ISI #: 001129725400001
Rights: 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
zz.pdfPublished version8.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on Aug 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.