Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/42215
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChang, Chrystal-
dc.contributor.authorBarham, David W.-
dc.contributor.authorDalimov, Zafardjan-
dc.contributor.authorSwerdloff, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorSadeghi-Nejad, Hossein-
dc.contributor.authorAndrianne, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorSempels, Maxime-
dc.contributor.authorHsieh, Tung-Chin-
dc.contributor.authorHatzichristodoulou, Georgios-
dc.contributor.authorHammad, Muhammed-
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Jake-
dc.contributor.authorOsmonov, Daniar-
dc.contributor.authorLentz, Aaron-
dc.contributor.authorPerito, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorSuarez-Sarmiento, Alfredo-
dc.contributor.authorHotaling, James-
dc.contributor.authorGross, Kelli-
dc.contributor.authorJones, James M.-
dc.contributor.authorVAN RENTERGHEM, Koenraad-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Sung Hun-
dc.contributor.authorWarner, J. Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorZiegelmann, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorModgil, Vaibhav-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Adam-
dc.contributor.authorPearce, Ian-
dc.contributor.authorGross, Martin S.-
dc.contributor.authorYafi, Faysal A.-
dc.contributor.authorSimhan, Jay-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-23T08:26:38Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-23T08:26:38Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2024-01-23T07:39:44Z-
dc.identifier.citationUROLOGY, 181 , p. 150 -154-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/42215-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE To assess the difference in outcomes between single dilation (SingD) and sequential dilation (SeqD) in primary penile implantation, hypothesizing that patients who undergo SeqD had higher rates of noninfectious complications. METHODS We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of men undergoing primary inflatable penile prosthesis placement. Intraoperative complications and postoperative noninfectious outcomes were assessed between the two groups. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of complications.RESULTS A total of 3293 patients met inclusion criteria. After matching, there were 379 patients who underwent SingD and 379 patients who underwent SeqD. There was no significant difference in intraoperative complications between patients who underwent SingD vs SeqD, nor was there any difference in cylinder length (20 cm with interquartile range [IQR] 18-21 cm vs 20 cm with IQR 1820 cm respectively, P = .4). On multivariable analysis, SeqD (OR 5.23 with IQR 2.74-10, P < .001) and older age (OR 1.04 with IQR 1.01-1.06, P = .007) were predictive of postoperative noninfectious complications. There was no significant difference in intraoperative complications between patients who underwent SingD vs SeqD, nor was there any difference in cylinder length. SeqD and older age were predictive of postoperative noninfectious complications. CONCLUSION During inflatable penile prosthesis placement in the uncomplicated patient without fibrosis, SingD is a safe technique to utilize during implantation that will minimize postoperative adverse events, and promote device longevity without loss of cylinder length. UROLOGY 181: 150- 154, 2023. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC-
dc.rights2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.subject.otherMale-
dc.subject.otherHumans-
dc.subject.otherRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.otherDilatation-
dc.subject.otherPostoperative Complications-
dc.subject.otherIntraoperative Complications-
dc.subject.otherPenile Prosthesis-
dc.subject.otherPenile Implantation-
dc.subject.otherErectile Dysfunction-
dc.titleSingle Dilation in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Is Associated With Fewer Corporal Complications Than Sequential Dilation-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage154-
dc.identifier.spage150-
dc.identifier.volume181-
local.format.pages5-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesSimhan, J (corresponding author), Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19422 USA.-
dc.description.notesjsimhan@gmail.com-
local.publisher.placeSTE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.037-
dc.identifier.pmid37574145-
dc.identifier.isi001124453400001-
dc.contributor.orcidChang, Chrystal/0000-0002-4269-0543-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Simhan, Jay] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19422 USA.-
local.description.affiliationUniv Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Orange, CA 92668 USA.-
local.description.affiliationNYU Langone, NYU Grossman Sch Med, New York, NY USA.-
local.description.affiliationCtr Hosp Univ Liege, Serv Urol, Liege, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliationUniv Calif San Diego, Dept Urol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA.-
local.description.affiliationMartha Maria Hosp Nuremberg, Dept Urol, Nurnberg, Germany.-
local.description.affiliationUniv Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Urol, Kiel, Germany.-
local.description.affiliationDuke Univ, Dept Urol, Durham, NC USA.-
local.description.affiliationPerito Urol, Coral Gables, FL USA.-
local.description.affiliationUniv Utah, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Salt Lake City, UT USA.-
local.description.affiliationDartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Urol Sect, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA.-
local.description.affiliationJessa Hosp, Dept Urol, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliationSewum Prosthet Urol Ctr Excellence, Seoul, South Korea.-
local.description.affiliationMayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN USA.-
local.description.affiliationManchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester Androl Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England.-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.contributorChang, Chrystal-
item.contributorBarham, David W.-
item.contributorDalimov, Zafardjan-
item.contributorSwerdloff, Daniel-
item.contributorSadeghi-Nejad, Hossein-
item.contributorAndrianne, Robert-
item.contributorSempels, Maxime-
item.contributorHsieh, Tung-Chin-
item.contributorHatzichristodoulou, Georgios-
item.contributorHammad, Muhammed-
item.contributorMiller, Jake-
item.contributorOsmonov, Daniar-
item.contributorLentz, Aaron-
item.contributorPerito, Paul-
item.contributorSuarez-Sarmiento, Alfredo-
item.contributorHotaling, James-
item.contributorGross, Kelli-
item.contributorJones, James M.-
item.contributorVAN RENTERGHEM, Koenraad-
item.contributorPark, Sung Hun-
item.contributorWarner, J. Nicholas-
item.contributorZiegelmann, Matthew-
item.contributorModgil, Vaibhav-
item.contributorJones, Adam-
item.contributorPearce, Ian-
item.contributorGross, Martin S.-
item.contributorYafi, Faysal A.-
item.contributorSimhan, Jay-
item.fullcitationChang, Chrystal; Barham, David W.; Dalimov, Zafardjan; Swerdloff, Daniel; Sadeghi-Nejad, Hossein; Andrianne, Robert; Sempels, Maxime; Hsieh, Tung-Chin; Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios; Hammad, Muhammed; Miller, Jake; Osmonov, Daniar; Lentz, Aaron; Perito, Paul; Suarez-Sarmiento, Alfredo; Hotaling, James; Gross, Kelli; Jones, James M.; VAN RENTERGHEM, Koenraad; Park, Sung Hun; Warner, J. Nicholas; Ziegelmann, Matthew; Modgil, Vaibhav; Jones, Adam; Pearce, Ian; Gross, Martin S.; Yafi, Faysal A. & Simhan, Jay (2023) Single Dilation in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Is Associated With Fewer Corporal Complications Than Sequential Dilation. In: UROLOGY, 181 , p. 150 -154.-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn0090-4295-
crisitem.journal.eissn1527-9995-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.