Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/42277
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | BIELEN, Samantha | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-29T14:45:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-29T14:45:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-01-16T09:11:47Z | - |
dc.identifier.citation | JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 90 (Art N° 102147) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/42277 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper exploits detailed offender-level data from the public prosecutor service to analyze whether a reform aimed at reducing recidivism was effective. The objective of this reform was to enhance deterrence by improving the certainty and celerity of punishment. More specifically, it (1) stimulated prosecutors to intensify the use of alternative dispositions (such as imposing settlements) in criminal cases that would otherwise have been dismissed, (2) reduced processing times by improving the collaboration between police and prosecutors, and (3) encouraged tailored decisions. Using a difference-in-differences approach, I exploit variation in when and where the district attorney reform was introduced to quantify its effect on recidivism rates. In doing so, I am able to compare otherwise similar individuals, who committed similar crimes, but who underwent different procedures. I further use an event study to assess the evolution of relative recidivism rates, and explore possible mechanisms including immediacy and certainty of punishment. The data reveal that after the reform, the prospects of recidivism linked to local crimes targeted by the reform decreased by 5 percentage points, a 26% reduction over the sample mean. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | I am grateful to the staff of the District Attorney office of Limburg, the statistical analysts of the public prosecutor’s office and the police zones CARMA and LRH for making this project possible. For helpful comments and suggestions, I thank participants of the International Empirical Legal Studies Conference in Amsterdam. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | - | |
dc.subject.other | Deterrence | - |
dc.subject.other | Recidivism | - |
dc.subject.other | Prosecutors | - |
dc.subject.other | Reform | - |
dc.title | Prosecutors and crime deterrence: Evidence from a difference-in-differences analysis with staggered treatment | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 90 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr | 102147 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102147 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235223001186 | - |
local.provider.type | CrossRef | - |
local.uhasselt.international | no | - |
item.fullcitation | BIELEN, Samantha (2024) Prosecutors and crime deterrence: Evidence from a difference-in-differences analysis with staggered treatment. In: JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 90 (Art N° 102147). | - |
item.contributor | BIELEN, Samantha | - |
item.embargoEndDate | 2025-01-29 | - |
item.accessRights | Embargoed Access | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 0047-2352 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 1873-6203 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0047235223001186-main.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 1.44 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Prosecutors and Crime Deterrence- Bielen.pdf Until 2025-01-29 | Peer-reviewed author version | 504.06 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.