Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/42557
Title: Can patients who have low-grade hip osteoarthritis expect the same outcome after total hip arthroplasty compared to those who have end-stage osteoarthritis? - A Matched Case-Control Study
Authors: Peeters, Wouter
VANDEPUTTE, Frans-Jozef 
TIMMERMANS, Annick 
ROOSE, Stijn 
Verhaegen, Jeroen
CORTEN, Kristoff 
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: Elsevier
Source: Journal of Arthroplasty,
Status: Early view
Abstract: Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective procedure for patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA). In addition, when hip preservation surgery is no longer indicated due to the presence of early or mild arthritic changes, THA can also be considered. Whether these patients can expect the same outcome after THA as patients who have end-stage OA remains unclear. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes after THA of patients who have low-grade OA versus a matched cohort with end-stage OA. Methods This is a retrospective, single-center, multi-surgeon case-control study in a high-volume referral center. Based on a cohort of 2,189 primary anterior approach THAs (1,815 patients), 50 low-grade OA cases were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and Body Mass Index (BMI) to 50 controls who have end-stage OA. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) were Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Results No significant differences in preoperative PROMs between low-grade and end-stage OA patients were found, except for SF-36 pain (33.0 versus 41.0; P = 0.045). In both groups a significant improvement of all PROMs was found postoperatively. However, all HOOS scores were significantly lower in the low-grade OA group compared to the end-stage OA group. In the group with low-grade OA, a significantly lower percentage of patients achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) after THA compared to the group with end-stage OA. Conclusion Patients who have low-grade OA can expect substantial clinical improvement after THA. However, the improvement is lower compared to patients who have end-stage OA. A thorough understanding of the factors that may lead to inferior clinical outcomes is imperative to improving the indications for THA in individuals who have low-grade OA.
Keywords: Primary Hip Arthroplasty;Low grade osteoarthritis;Outcome;Direct Anterior Approach
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/42557
ISSN: 0883-5403
e-ISSN: 1532-8406
DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.012
Rights: 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.