Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/43002
Title: The Impact of Baseline User Characteristics on the Benefits of Real-Time Versus Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Moderator Analyses of the ALERTT1 Trial
Authors: Visser, Margaretha Martha
Charleer, Sara
FIEUWS, Steffen 
De Block, Christophe
Hilbrands, Robert
Van Huffel, Liesbeth
Maes, Toon
Vanhaverbeke, Gerd
Dirinck, Eveline
Myngheer, Nele
Vercammen, Chris
Nobels, Frank
Keymeulen, Bart
Mathieu, Chantal
Gillard, Pieter
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
Source: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 18 (3) , p. 660 -666
Abstract: Background: ALERTT1 showed that switching from intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) without alerts to real-time CGM (rtCGM) with alert functionality improved time in range (TIR; 70-180 mg/dL), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), time <54 mg/dL, and Hypoglycemia Fear Survey version II worry subscale (HFS-worry) score after six months in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Moderator analyses aimed to identify certain subgroups that would benefit more from switching to rtCGM than others. Methods: Post hoc analyses of ALERTT1 evaluated the impact of 14 baseline characteristics on the difference (delta) in mean TIR, HbA1c, time <54 mg/dL, and HFS-worry score at six months between rtCGM and isCGM. Therefore, the delta was allowed to depend on each of these variables by including interactions in the moderator analysis model. Analyses were performed separately for each variable; variables with P < .10 in the univariable analysis were combined into a single model. Results: Univariable analyses showed no dependency of delta TIR, HbA1c, or time <54 mg/dL on variables other than CGM type. Only delta HFS-worry score depended on baseline HbA1c (P = .0059), indicating less worries with rtCGM in people with baseline HbA1c <6.5% or >= 8%. Given P < .10 for dependency of delta TIR on insulin therapy type (favoring multiple daily injections), baseline HbA1c, and baseline TIR, these variables were combined into a multivariable analysis; interactions were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Except for HFS-worry score, no interactions between 14 baseline characteristics and the six-month intervention effect of rtCGM on TIR, HbA1c, or time <54 mg/dL were observed, supporting the conclusion of ALERTT1 that switching from isCGM without alerts to rtCGM with alert functionality is beneficial for a wide range of people with T1D.
Notes: Gillard, P (corresponding author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Endocrinol, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
pieter.gillard@uzleuven.be
Keywords: continuous glucose monitoring;intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring;moderator analysis;real-time continuous glucose monitoring;type 1 diabetes
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/43002
ISSN: 1932-2968
e-ISSN: 1932-2968
DOI: 10.1177/19322968221128315
ISI #: 001215677700018
Rights: 2022 Diabetes Technology Society
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The Impact of Baseline User Characteristics on the Benefits of Real-Time Versus Intermittently Scanned .pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version916.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Sep 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.