Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/43549
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVAN DEN BERGH, Bart-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-05T09:46:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-05T09:46:05Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.date.submitted2024-07-25T08:32:34Z-
dc.identifier.citationNotarieel en fiscaal maandblad, 3 (2022) , p. 82 -97-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/43549-
dc.language.isonl-
dc.titleBewezen of niet: that's the question. Bewijsperikelen in de gerechtelijke vereffening-verdeling-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage97-
dc.identifier.issue2022-
dc.identifier.spage82-
dc.identifier.volume3-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorVAN DEN BERGH, Bart-
item.fullcitationVAN DEN BERGH, Bart (2022) Bewezen of niet: that's the question. Bewijsperikelen in de gerechtelijke vereffening-verdeling. In: Notarieel en fiscaal maandblad, 3 (2022) , p. 82 -97.-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
crisitem.journal.issn2034-2373-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Notariaat. Notarieel en fiscaal maandblad 2022, afl. 3, 82-97.pdf
  Restricted Access		Published version177.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.