Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/43571
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBYLOOS, Dries-
dc.contributor.authorVANDOREN, Bram-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T09:59:06Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-19T09:59:06Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-08-19T08:30:32Z-
dc.identifier.citationEngineering structures, 316 (Art N° 118592)-
dc.identifier.issn0141-0296-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/43571-
dc.description.abstractIn lightweight timber frame buildings, the horizontal stability against, for instance, wind loads is mainly ensured by shear diaphragms. These shear walls are typically constructed using a timber frame and a load- bearing sheathing layer on one or both sides of the framework. An atypical construction method uses double sheathing panels on top of each other, e.g. because of acoustic or fire safety reasons. However, no design rules are provided for such structures: the respective current and upcoming European standard (Eurocode 5 part 1-1) does not consider the structural contribution of both sheathing panel layers. Therefore, in this study, an experimental campaign is performed to enhance the knowledge of such double-sheathed shear walls, and two analytical calculation methods are proposed. The experimental campaign tests eight full-scale configurations through a racking resistance test with monotonic loading. Sheathing materials include load-bearing and non- load-bearing gypsum plasterboards and resinoid-bonded particle boards. All sheathing panels are connected to the fully anchored frames using staples. Results demonstrate that adding a second sheathing layer of the same material, with the same fastener disposition as the inner layer does not fully double the racking capacity and racking stiffness. Secondly, using a non-load-bearing gypsum plate as the inner layer creates a long plateau phase at the post-peak loading response, producing a less brittle failure behavior. The experiments are used as a benchmark to develop an analytical model based on Bla ss and Gebhardt's method for calculating the shear capacity of dowel-type connections with an interlayer. The proposed method introduces an interaction factor that takes into account that the connections of the outer sheathing layer, which pass through the inner sheathing layer, also contribute to the sheathing-to-framing connection of the latter. A simplified model is also presented, using a combination factor that aligns with the current Eurocode 5 design method for walls with sheathing panels on both sides of the framing. Different values for the respective interaction and combination factors are verified to determine a safe value for each tested configuration.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors acknowledge the work of Jan Leuraers, Dan Dragan, and Frederick Truyers, who performed the experiments on the different wall configurations. Secondly, the authors gratefully thank VLAIO (Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship) for financing this research and Special Research Fund (BOF) of Hasselt University for supporting this research. VLAIO reference: HBC.2020.2098; BOF reference: BOF22OWB18.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD-
dc.rights2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies-
dc.subject.otherShear wall diaphragm; Staples; Racking resistance; Eurocode 5;-
dc.subject.otherDouble-layered sheathing panel; Gypsum plasterboard; Resinoid-bonded-
dc.subject.otherparticle board; Experiments; Analytical-
dc.titleExperimental and analytical assessment of the racking behavior of timber frame walls with single-sided double-layered sheathing panels-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.volume316-
local.format.pages12-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesByloos, D (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Engn Technol, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium.-
dc.description.notesdries.byloos@uhasselt.be-
local.publisher.place125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND-
dc.relation.references[1] Darvishi E, Namdar A, Feng X, Ge Q. Seismic resistance of timber structure - A state of the art design. Procedia Struct Integr 2016;2:2750–6. [2] Žegarac Leskovar V, Premrov M. Energy-efficient timber-glass houses. 2013, p. 117–78. [3] Ni C, Karacabeyli E. Effect of overturning restraint on performance of shear walls force- and performance-based seismic design guidelines for timber-steel hybrid structures view project modelling of timber structures under force and fire view project effect of overturning restraint on performance of shear walls. In: 2000 worldconference on timber engineering. 2000. [4] Togay A, Anil Ö, Işleyen ÜK, Ediz İ, Durucan C. Finite-element analyses of light timber-framed walls with and without openings. Proc Inst Civ Eng: Struct Build 2017;170:555–69. [5] Salenikovich A. The racking performance of lightframe shear walls (Ph.D. thesis), Virginia Poluyechnic Institute and State University; 2000. [6] Premrov M, Dobrila P. Numerical analysis of the influence of fastener disposition on the behaviour of timber-framed walls with wood-based sheathing boards. WIT Trans Built Environ 2010. [7] Dhonju R, D’Amico B, Kermani A, Porteous J, Zhang B. Parametric evaluation of racking performance of platform timber framed walls. Structures 2017;12:75–87. [8] Verdret Y, Faye C, Elachachi SM, Le Magorou L, Garcia P. Experimental investigation on stapled and nailed connections in light timber frame walls. Constr Build Mater 2015;91:260–73. [9] Kuai L, Ormarsson S, Vessby J. Nonlinear FE-analysis and testing of light-frame timber shear walls subjected to cyclic loading. Constr Build Mater 2023;362. [10] Qiang R, Zhou L, Ni C, Huang D. Seismic performance of high-capacity light wood frame shear walls with three rows of nails. Eng Struct 2022;268. [11] Premrov M, Dobrila P. Numerical analysis of sheathing boards influence on racking resistance of timber-frame walls. Adv Eng Softw 2012;45:21–7. [12] Wolfe RW. Contribution of gypsum wallboard to racking resistance of lightframe walls. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper FPL439, Madison: US Department of Agriculture; 1983. [13] Toothman AJ. Monotonic and cyclic performance of light-frame shear walls with various sheathing materials (Ph.D. thesis), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2003. [14] Zheng W, Lu W, Liu W, Wang L, Ling Z. Experimental investigation of laterally loaded double-shear-nail connections used in midply wood shear walls. Constr Build Mater 2015;101:761–71. [15] Anil Ö, Togay A, Işleyen ÜK, Döngel N, Stlü C. Effect of timber type and nail spacing on the hysteretic behavior of timber-framed shear walls with openings. Int J Civ Eng 2018;16:629–46. [16] Doudak G, Smith I, McClure G, Mohammad M, Lepper P. Tests and finite element models of wood light-frame shear walls with openings. Prog Struct Eng Mater 2006;8:165–74. [17] European Committee for Standardization. EN-1995-1-1: Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures - Part 1-1: General - Common rules and rules for buildings. 2005. [18] Porteous J, Kermani A. Structural timber design to eurocode 5. Blackwell Publishing; 2008, p. 338–72. [19] British Standard Institution. BS 5268-2:2002: Structural use of timber, part 2: Code of practice for permissible stress design, materials and workmanship. 2002. [20] Premrov M. Influence of fasteners disposition on behaviour of timber-framed walls with double fibre-plaster coating boards. Am J Appl Sci 2007;5:1–6. [21] Spasojevic M, Daneshvar H, Niederwestberg J, Chen Y, Chui YH, Gong M. Structural performance of light wood shear walls built with insulated sheathing panels. Eng Struct 2021;241. [22] Yue K, Liang B, Liu J, Li M, Pu Y, Lu W, Han Z, Li Z. Fire resistance of light wood frame walls sheathed with innovative gypsum-particle composite: Experimental investigations. J Build Eng 2022;45. [23] Kuai L, Ormarsson S, Vessby J, Maharjan R. A numerical and experimental investigation of non-linear deformation behaviours in light-frame timber walls. Eng Struct 2022;252. [24] British Standard Institution. PD 6693-1:2019: Recommendations for the design of timber structures to Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures. General - common rules and rules for building. 2019. [25] European Committee for Standardization. CEN Enquiry draft prEN 1995-1- 1:2023, Eurocode 5 - Design of timber structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. 2023. [26] Gebhardt G, Blaß HJ. Load-carrying capacity of timber-wood fibre insulation board-joints with dowel type fasteners. tech. rep., Karlsruher Institut für Technologie; 2009. [27] Blaß HJ, Laskewitz B. Tragfähigkeit von verbindungen mit stiftförmigen verbindungsmitteln und zwischenschichten. tech. rep., Karlsruher Institut für Technologie; 2003. [28] Johansen KW. Theory of timber connections. International Association of bridge and structural Engineering; 1949, p. 249–62. [29] European Committee for Standardization. EN-594: Timber structures, Test methods - Racking strength and stifness of timber frame wall panels. 2011. [30] European Committee for Standardization. EN-520+A1: Gypsum plasterboardsdefinitions, requirements and test methods. 2009. [31] European Committee for Standardization. EN-13986+A1: Wood-based panels for use in construction - Characteristics, evaluation of conformity and marking. 2015. [32] Livas C, Ekevad M, Öhman M. Experimental analysis of passively and actively reinforced glued-laminated timber with focus on ductility. Wood Mater Sci Eng 2022;17:129–37.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr118592-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118592-
dc.identifier.isi001274329400001-
dc.contributor.orcidBYLOOS, Dries/0000-0002-4506-365X-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7323-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Byloos, Dries; Vandoren, Bram] Hasselt Univ, Fac Engn Technol, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsEmbargoed Access-
item.contributorBYLOOS, Dries-
item.contributorVANDOREN, Bram-
item.fullcitationBYLOOS, Dries & VANDOREN, Bram (2024) Experimental and analytical assessment of the racking behavior of timber frame walls with single-sided double-layered sheathing panels. In: Engineering structures, 316 (Art N° 118592).-
item.embargoEndDate2025-04-01-
crisitem.journal.issn0141-0296-
crisitem.journal.eissn1873-7323-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.