Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/43619
Title: Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions: the international, multicentre, randomised ULTRACOLOR Trial
Authors: Meijers, Thomas A.
Nap, Alexander
Aminian, Adel
Schmitz, Thomas
DENS, Jo 
Teeuwen, Koen
van Kuijk, Jan-Peter
van Wely, Marleen
BATAILLE, Yoann 
Kraaijeveld, Adriaan O.
Roolvink, Vincent
Dambrink, Jan Henk E.
Gosselink, A. T. Marcel
Hermanides, Renicus S.
Ottervanger, Jan Paul
Tsilingiris, Ioannis
van den Buijs, Deborah M. F.
van Royen, Niels
van Leeuwen, Maarten A. H.
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: EUROPA EDITION
Source: EuroIntervention, 20 (14) , p. e876 -e886
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Transfemoral access is often used when large-bore guide catheters are required for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex coronary lesions, especially when large-bore transradial access is contraindicated. Whether the risk of access site complications for these procedures may be reduced by ultrasoundguided puncture is unclear. AIMS: We aimed to show the superiority of ultrasound-guided femoral puncture compared to fluoroscopy-guided access in large-bore complex PCI with regard to access site-related Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3 or 5 bleeding and/or vascular complications requiring intervention during hospitalisation. METHODS: The ULTRACOLOR Trial is an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial investigating whether ultrasound-guided large-bore femoral access reduces clinically relevant access site complications compared to fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions. RESULTS: A total of 544 patients undergoing complex PCI mandating large-bore (>= 7 Fr) transfemoral access were randomised at 10 European centres (median age 71; 76% male). Of these patients, 68% required PCI of a chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was met in 18.9% of PCI with fluoroscopy-guided access and 15.7% of PCI with ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32). First-pass puncture success was 92% for ultrasound-guided access versus 85% for fluoroscopy-guided access (p=0.02). The median time in the catheterisation laboratory was 102 minutes versus 105 minutes (p=0.43), and the major adverse cardiovascular event rate at 1 month was 4.1% for fluoroscopyguided access and 2.6% for ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: As compared to fluoroscopy-guided access, the routine use of ultrasound-guided access for largebore transfemoral complex PCI did not significantly reduce clinically relevant bleeding or vascular access site complications. A significantly higher first-pass puncture success rate was demonstrated for ultrasound-guided access. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04837404
Notes: van Leeuwen, MAH (corresponding author), Isala Heart Ctr, Dr van Heesweg 2, NL-8025 AB Zwolle, Netherlands.
m.a.h.van.leeuwen@isala.nl
Keywords: complex PCI;CTO;large bore;ultrasound;vascular access
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/43619
ISSN: 1774-024X
e-ISSN: 1969-6213
DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00089
ISI #: 001272976700006
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.