Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/43621
Title: Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse Phenotype: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Analysis Using a Multicenter Cardiac MRI Registry
Authors: Akyea, Ralph Kwame
Figliozzi, Stefano
Lopes, Pedro M.
Bauer, Klemens B.
MOURA FERREIRA, Sara 
Tondi, Lara
Mushtaq, Saima
Censi, Stefano
Pavon, Anna Giulia
Bassi, Ilaria
Galian-Gay, Laura
Teske, Arco J.
Biondi, Federico
Filomena, Domenico
Stylianidis, Vasileios
Torlasco, Camilla
Muraru, Denisa
Monney, Pierre
Quattrocchi, Giuseppina
Maestrini, Viviana
Agati, Luciano
Monti, Lorenzo
Pedrotti, Patrizia
Vandenberk, Bert
Squeri, Angelo
Lombardi, Massimo
Ferreira, Antonio M.
Schwitter, Juerg
Aquaro, Giovanni Donato
Pontone, Gianluca
Chiribiri, Amedeo
Palomares, Jose F. Rodriguez
Yilmaz, Ali
Andreini, Daniele
Florian, Anca-Rezeda
Francone, Marco
Leiner, Tim
Abecasis, Joao
Badano, Luigi Paolo
Bogaert, Jan
Georgiopoulos, Georgios
Masci, Pier-Giorgio
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA (RSNA)
Source: Radiology-Cardiothoracic Imaging, 6 (3) (Art N° e230247)
Abstract: Purpose: To use unsupervised machine learning to identify phenotypic clusters with increased risk of arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with MVP without hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac MRI between October 2007 and June 2020 in 15 European tertiary centers. The study end point was a composite of sustained ventricular tachycardia, (aborted) sudden cardiac death, or unexplained syncope. Unsupervised data-driven hierarchical k-mean algorithm was utilized to identify phenotypic clusters. The association between clusters and the study end point was assessed by Cox proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 474 patients (mean age, 47 years +/- 16 [SD]; 244 female, 230 male) with two phenotypic clusters were identified. Patients in cluster 2 (199 of 474, 42%) had more severe mitral valve degeneration (ie, bileaflet MVP and leaflet displacement), left and right heart chamber remodeling, and myocardial fibrosis as assessed with LGE cardiac MRI than those in cluster 1. Demographic and clinical features (ie, symptoms, arrhythmias at Holter monitoring) had negligible contribution in differentiating the two clusters. Compared with cluster 1, the risk of developing the study end point over a median follow-up of 39 months was significantly higher in cluster 2 patients (hazard ratio: 3.79 [95% CI: 1.19, 12.12], P = .02) after adjustment for LGE extent. Conclusion: Among patients with MVP without significant mitral regurgitation or LV dysfunction, unsupervised machine learning enabled the identification of two phenotypic clusters with distinct arrhythmic outcomes based primarily on cardiac MRI features. These results encourage the use of in-depth imaging-based phenotyping for implementing arrhythmic risk prediction in MVP.
Notes: Masci, PG (corresponding author), Kings Coll London, Fac Life Sci & Med, Sch Biomed Engn & Imaging Sci, Westminster Bridge Rd, London SE1 7EH, England.
pier_giorgio.masci@kcl.ac.uk
Keywords: MR Imaging;Cardiac;Cardiac MRI;Mitral Valve Prolapse;Cluster Analysis;Ventricular Arrhythmia;Sudden Cardiac Death;Unsupervised Machine Learning
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/43621
ISSN: 2638-6135
e-ISSN: 2638-6135
DOI: 10.1148/ryct.230247
ISI #: 001272579300019
Rights: RSNA, 2024
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.