Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/45572
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDestoop, Marlies-
dc.contributor.authorVandenplas, Yvan-
dc.contributor.authorRAES, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorHauser, Bruno-
dc.contributor.authorDe Greef, Elisabeth-
dc.contributor.authorHuysentruyt, Koen-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-10T13:06:27Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-10T13:06:27Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-03-06T13:24:40Z-
dc.identifier.citationNutrients, 17 (4) (Art N° 718)-
dc.identifier.issn-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/45572-
dc.description.abstractBackground: A 2014 survey showed nutritional management could be improved in Belgian pediatric departments. This follow-up survey aimed to: (1) list allied health resources/staffing in Belgian pediatric departments, (2) survey nutritional screening and follow-up, and (3) identify barriers. Methods: A nationwide survey (February-April 2021) via national and regional pediatric associations. Results: 61/90 (67.8%) of Belgian pediatric departments responded (80.1% of all Belgian pediatric hospital beds); 60.7% of the respondents were from larger centers (LCs, >= 20 beds). A dietitian was present in 80.3% of all responding units (LCs vs. smaller centers (SCs): p = 0.133), compared to 46.5% in the 2014 survey. Most dietitians seldom or never participate in ward rounds (86.9%) and participate only ad hoc to case discussions (72.1%). Systematic nutritional screening is implemented in 32.8% of pediatric departments. The screening tool STRONGkids is used in 30% of responding centers, compared to 21% in 2014. The most common barriers to conducting nutritional screening were lack of time (59.0%), a lack of knowledge (47.5%), and a lack of staff (42.6%). In French-speaking centers (FrCs), a positive screening result most often led to referral to a dietitian (86.7%), whereas in Dutch-speaking centers (DuCs), it more frequently resulted in a discussion with the pediatrician about nutritional management (54.3%) than referral to a dietitian (34.8%). Nutritional follow-up after discharge is most often conducted by a physician, with or without the involvement of a dietitian (95.1%), rather than a dietitian alone (3.3%). Malnutrition management barriers included "no barriers" (50.8%), a lack of knowledge (34.4%), a lack of reimbursement (24.6%), and a lack of time (24.6%). The barriers remain largely unchanged compared to 2014. Conclusions: The increasing availability of dietitians and the use of a screening tool in pediatric departments suggest an encouraging but limited improvement in nutritional care in Belgium. Persistent barriers that have remained unchanged since 2014 continue to hinder substantial advancements in nutritional care.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.rights2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.subject.otherdisease-associated malnutrition (DAM)-
dc.subject.otherdisease-associated malnutrition (DAM)-
dc.subject.otherpediatric malnutrition-
dc.subject.otherpediatric malnutrition-
dc.subject.othernutritional screening-
dc.subject.othernutritional screening-
dc.subject.otherbarriers to screening-
dc.subject.otherbarriers to screening-
dc.titleNutritional Care of Hospitalized Children in Belgium: A Follow-Up Survey-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.volume17-
local.format.pages12-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesHuysentruyt, K (corresponding author), Vrije Univ Brussel VUB, Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, Dept Paediat Gastro Enterol, KidZ Hlth Castle, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium.-
dc.description.notesmarlies.destoop@vub.be; yvan.vandenplas@uzbrussel.be;-
dc.description.notesmarc.raes@jessazh.be; bruno.hauser@uzbrussel.be;-
dc.description.noteselisabeth.degreef@uzbrussel.be; koen.huysentruyt@uzbrussel.be-
local.publisher.placeMDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr718-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/nu17040718-
dc.identifier.pmid40005046-
dc.identifier.isi001429593100001-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Destoop, Marlies; Vandenplas, Yvan; Hauser, Bruno; De Greef, Elisabeth; Huysentruyt, Koen] Vrije Univ Brussel VUB, Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, Dept Paediat Gastro Enterol, KidZ Hlth Castle, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Raes, Marc] Jessa Ziekenhuis, Dept Paediat, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Raes, Marc] Belgische Vereniging Kindergeneeskunde BVK, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorDestoop, Marlies-
item.contributorVandenplas, Yvan-
item.contributorRAES, Marc-
item.contributorHauser, Bruno-
item.contributorDe Greef, Elisabeth-
item.contributorHuysentruyt, Koen-
item.fullcitationDestoop, Marlies; Vandenplas, Yvan; RAES, Marc; Hauser, Bruno; De Greef, Elisabeth & Huysentruyt, Koen (2025) Nutritional Care of Hospitalized Children in Belgium: A Follow-Up Survey. In: Nutrients, 17 (4) (Art N° 718).-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.eissn2072-6643-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Nutritional Care of Hospitalized Children in Belgium_ A Follow-Up Survey.pdfPublished version1.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.