Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/45776
Title: Age-related differences across the adult lifespan: a comparison of six field assessments of physical function
Authors: Meulemans, Lien
DEBOUTTE, Jolien 
Seghers, Jan
Delecluse, Christophe
VAN ROIE, Evelien 
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: SPRINGER
Source: Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 37 (1) (Art N° 72)
Abstract: Background Age-related declines in physical capabilities often result from decreased lower-limb muscle strength and power, which are measurable through field tests. Various tests can detect functional declines in older adults, but their responsiveness to age-related differences is less understood in those without substantial impairments. Therefore, this study evaluated and compared the ability of field tests to detect age-related changes in physical and muscle function across adulthood. Methods 304 participants (52% female; 19-85 years) completed six field tests: handgrip strength (HGS), maximal gait speed (MGS) over a 10-m course, 5-repetition sit-to-stand power (STSP), timed up and go (TUG), countermovement jump (CMJ), and stair climbing power (SCP). Segmented regression analysis determined the relationship between age and field test performance, and identified the age at which the rate of decline increased. A multilevel linear mixed model compared decline rates between tests. Results Before 60 years, SCP and CMJ were responsive to age-related differences (-0.70 to -0.81%/year, p < 0.05), whereas TUG and STSP (lower age-related decline, -0.18% to -0.52%/year, p < 0.05) and HGS and MGS (no significant age-related decline) exhibited lower responsiveness. After 60, most tests (except the STSP) demonstrated increased responsiveness to age-related differences, although these differences remain most pronounced in SCP and CMJ (-1.61 to -1.75%/year, p < 0.05). Conclusions These findings imply that most field tests are responsive to age-related declines in physical and/or muscle function after 60. In younger age groups, field tests that evaluate lower-limb power and have minimal ceiling effects, such as SCP and CMJ, should be prioritized.
Notes: Van Roie, E (corresponding author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Movement Sci, Phys Act Sports & Hlth Res Grp, Tervuursevest 101 Bus 1501, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.; Van Roie, E (corresponding author), Univ Hasselt, Fac Rehabil Sci, REVAL Rehabil Res Ctr, Wetenschapspk 7, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
evelien.vanroie@kuleuven.be
Keywords: Stair climbing;Muscle power;AgeingInertial measurement unit;Physical capacity;Functional performance
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/45776
ISSN: 1594-0667
e-ISSN: 1720-8319
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-025-02965-1
ISI #: 001439796200006
Rights: The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.o rg/licenses/by/4.0/.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s40520-025-02965-1.pdfPublished version1.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.