Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/45813
Title: | The occurrence of cervicogenic headache: A mapping review | Authors: | MINGELS, Sarah GRANITZER, Marita Jull, Gwendolen Dankaerts, Wim |
Issue Date: | 2025 | Publisher: | ELSEVIER | Source: | Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 77 (Art N° 103290) | Abstract: | Background: Occurrence of cervicogenic headache (CeH), mostly expressed by estimates of the prevalence, ranges between 0.4% and 42%. However, transparency on such estimates is lacking, which hinders generalizing results. Objective: Mapping the occurrence (expressed by incidence/prevalence) of CeH. Design: Mapping review. Method: A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus databases (last search update January 28th, 2025). The search query comprised terminology relating to "CeH", "prevalence", "incidence". Results: Thirty-four publications were included (prevalence n = 32, incidence n = 2). The prevalence of CeH varied depending on the geographical location (Norway: 0.17%- USA: 69%), population (age: 0.17%-56.7%, chronic headache: 0.17%- computer users: 64.5%), setting (inpatient: 13.8%-69%, outpatient: 0.38%-10%), diagnostic criteria (International Headache Society: 0.38%-40%, Cervicogenic Headache International Study Group: 0.17%-64.5%), and diagnostic process (questionnaires: 5.3%-64.5%, clinical examination: 0.17%- 56.7%, diagnostic block: 0.17%-16.1%). Conclusion: Most publications were retrieved from Europe, Asia, and the United States. One multicentre study provided results for the African continent. No conclusion could be drawn on the incidence of CeH. The populations studied (e.g., general, age-stratified, specific), settings (e.g., hospital, private practice, clinics, emergency services), diagnostic criteria (e.g., International Headache Society or Cervicogenic Headache International Study Group) and processes (e.g., questionnaires, clinical examination) were heterogeneous. Four publications required a diagnostic block in the diagnostic process. A standardized methodology, especially regarding the diagnostic criteria and process, is needed to compare studies, guarantee quality, and provide estimates to inform policy makers. | Notes: | Mingels, S (corresponding author), Leuven Univ, Fac Movement & Rehabil Sci, Dept Rehabil Sci, Musculoskeletal Res Unit, Leuven, Belgium. sarah.mingels@kuleuven.be; marita.granitzer@uhasselt.be; g.jull@uq.edu.au; wim.dankaerts@kuleuven.be |
Keywords: | Cervicogenic headache;occurrence;Incidence;prevalence;Mapping review | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/45813 | ISSN: | 2468-7812 | e-ISSN: | 2468-7812 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103290 | ISI #: | 001439074300001 | Rights: | 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The occurrence of cervicogenic headache_ A mapping review.pdf Until 2025-12-01 | Peer-reviewed author version | 2.84 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
ACFrOgDlmhuPiuWxKqu2GJiuzyrxed_6prNXxn-L9Yu5oh2cfe2lTlOk_t3L4A3CNu6WzBklqUIf0.pdf | 690.07 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.