Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/45819
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKENNEDY, Harriet-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-07T09:30:11Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-07T09:30:11Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2025-03-26T17:42:48Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/45819-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherStrasbourg Observers-
dc.titleOtite v the United Kingdom: What about the Incentivising Function of Process-Based Review?-
dc.typeOther-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatO-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedWeb Content-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://strasbourgobservers.com/2023/01/27/emotite-v-the-united-kingdom-what-about- the-incentivising-function-of-process-based-review-em/-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.contributorKENNEDY, Harriet-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationKENNEDY, Harriet (2023) Otite v the United Kingdom: What about the Incentivising Function of Process-Based Review?.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
strasbourgobservers.com-Otite v the United Kingdom What about the incentivising function of process-based review.pdfPublished version127.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.