Navigational difficulties after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

ObjectiveNavigation, the ability to find one's way from one place to another, is an important cognitive skill for maintaining autonomy in daily life. Several findings indicate that navigational ability can be impaired after stroke. However, navigation is rarely assessed in clinical practice, and evidence-based recommendations for suitable diagnostic tools are lacking. Furthermore, the scientific literature does not provide a meta-analytic estimation of the prevalence of post-stroke navigational impairments. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the tools to assess navigational difficulties after stroke, including their psychometric properties, and determine the prevalence of post-stroke navigational difficulties.MethodThree investigators independently and systematically searched publications performing assessments of navigation in the stroke population, with a fourth independent investigator consulted when discrepancies were present. References of the retrieved articles were hand searched for relevant articles.ResultsThe systematic review included 19 studies, reporting on 19 different approaches to assess objective and/or subjective navigation skills, each with different psychometric properties. The pooled effect size, using a random-effects model including data from a subset of 8 out of the 19 included studies, demonstrated a prevalence of post-stroke navigation impairments of 35% (95% CI: 0.29-0.42). However, this model was significantly heterogeneous.ConclusionsNavigational difficulties are a common neuropsychological deficit after stroke. However, navigation is a broad construct and a subdivision to reduce heterogeneity in navigation ability is recommended, e.g. by categorizing navigation into landmark-, location-, and path-based navigation impairment. The inclusion of objective and subjective assessments of navigation is recommended in clinical practice.RegistrationThe protocol was registered at the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023491346).