Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/46148
Title: The value of extra-diaphragmatic inspiratory muscle surface electromyography during postural control tasks in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Authors: KLAPS, Sim 
Langer, D.
Gosselink, R.
Dacha, S.
Louvaris, Z.
JACOBS, Nina 
Janssens , W.
JANSSENS, Lotte 
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
Source: Respiratory medicine, 243 (Art N° 108127)
Abstract: Concurrent dysfunctions in postural control and diaphragm are observed in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Measuring diaphragm activation traditionally involves transesophageal diaphragm electromyography (EMG(di)), which is costly and relatively invasive. Extra-diaphragmatic inspiratory muscle surface electromyography may serve as a useful physiological marker for EMG(di). This study compared EMG(di) amplitude with surface EMG amplitude of other inspiratory muscles, including sternocleidomastoid (sEMG(scm)), scalene (sEMG(scal)), and parasternal intercostal muscles (sEMG(ic)) during postural control tasks in nine patients with COPD (5 males; age: 65 +/- 6 years; forced expiratory volume in the first second: 60 +/- 27 % predicted). Simultaneous recordings of EMG(di), sEMG(scm), sEMG(scal), and sEMG(ic) amplitudes were obtained during six postural control tasks involving upright standing with ballistic arm movements under different conditions of support surface (stable/foam), arm movement frequency (single/repetitive), and breathing modes (normal/breath-hold at end-expiration). EMG amplitudes were normalized to each muscle's maximum voluntary contraction. A linear mixed model with Bonferroni-Holm post-hoc tests and Bland-Altman analyses were performed. There was a significant EMG-by-task interaction (p = 0.0223). The amplitude of EMG(di) was significantly lower than sEMG(ic) across all tasks (p < 0.0001 to 0.0007), while no significant differences were observed between EMG(di) and sEMG(scm) or EMG(di) and sEMG(scal) after Bonferroni-Holm correction (p = 0.019-0.858). Bland-Altman analyses indicated reasonable agreement between EMG(di) and both sEMG(scm) and sEMG(scal) (mean biases: 1.8 % and -3.7 %), while sEMG(ic) had a significantly higher overall bias of -20.7 %. These findings suggest that both sEMG(scal) and sEMG(scm) can serve as useful physiological markers for EMG(di) in postural control assessments in patients with COPD.
Notes: Klaps, S (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, REVAL Rehabil Res Ctr, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
sim.klaps@uhasselt.be
Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;Electromyography;Postural control;Diaphragm
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/46148
ISSN: 0954-6111
e-ISSN: 1532-3064
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108127
ISI #: 001494768400001
Rights: 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The value of extra-diaphragmatic inspiratory muscle .pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2.86 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.