Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/46360
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | VERSTRAETE, Arno | - |
dc.contributor.author | GEURTS, Eva | - |
dc.contributor.author | WIJNANTS, Maarten | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-22T11:23:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-22T11:23:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-01T09:34:06Z | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Nichols, Jeff (Ed.). Proceedingsbook of the Acm on Human-computer Interaction, ACM, | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/46360 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Virtual Reality (VR) is gaining popularity and is increasingly adopted across various industries for its potential to deliver immersive and effective skill development. However, we observe that VR training often follows a one-size-fits-all approach. Trainings typically do not adapt to to individual skill levels, which is particularly important in industrial assembly, where user profiles and expertise levels vary widely. To address this, we applied the concept of adaptive learning to VR assembly training, enabling the system to dynamically provide assistance levels when users struggle and gradually reduce support as their proficiency increases. This paper investigates the learning performance and subjective impact of two types of such adaptive approaches and a non-adaptive variant in a VR user study with 36 participants. The results show that adaptive training significantly enhances user experience and reduces perceived workload. At the same time, adaptive VR learning is found to have a positive impact on learning performance (quantified as a reduced number of assembly mistakes after training). In summary, our findings underscore the potential of applying adaptive learning approaches in VR. To guide future research, we propose guidelines to support the practical adoption of adaptive learning in VR training in manufacturing and beyond. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research was supported by Flanders Make, the strategic research centre for the manufacturing industry, in the project SKILLEDWORKFORCE. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ACM | - |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction | - |
dc.rights | 2025 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM | - |
dc.subject.other | Empirical studies in HCI | - |
dc.subject.other | Virtual reality | - |
dc.subject.other | • Applied computing → Computer-assisted instruction | - |
dc.subject.other | Interactive learning environments Additional Key Words and Phrases: Virtual Reality, Adaptive learning, Manufacturing, Industrial applications | - |
dc.subject.other | Training | - |
dc.subject.other | Personalization | - |
dc.subject.other | HCI | - |
dc.subject.other | Adaptive learning | - |
dc.subject.other | Manufacturing | - |
dc.subject.other | Industrial applications | - |
dc.title | Does One-Size Training Fit All? Evaluating Adaptive Learning for VR Assembly Training | - |
dc.type | Proceedings Paper | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Nichols, Jeff | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate | 2025, June 25-27 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename | The 17th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplace | Trier, Germany | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | - |
local.format.pages | 26 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | C1 | - |
local.publisher.place | New York | - |
dc.relation.references | [1] Patrick Albus, Andrea Vogt, and Tina Seufert. 2021. Signaling in virtual reality influences learning outcome and cognitive load. Computers & Education 166 (2021), 104154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104154 [2] V. Braun and V. Clarke. 2021. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.be/books?id=mToqEAAAQBAJ [3] Kelly Caine. 2016. Local standards for sample size at CHI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 981–992. [4] Jessica R Cauchard, Jeremy Frey, Octavia Zahrt, Krister Johnson, Alia Crum, and James A Landay. 2019. The positive impact of push vs pull progress feedback: a 6-week activity tracking study in the wild. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3 (2019), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351234 [5] Gustavo Tietz Cazeri, Luis Antonio de Santa-Eulalia, Milena Pavan Serafim, and Rosley Anholon. 2022. Training for Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review and directions for future research. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 19, 3 (2022), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2022.007 [6] You-Shyang Chen, Chun-Hui Wu, and Ta-g Chen. 2017. An Adaptive e-Learning System for Enhancing Learning Performance: Based on Dynamic Scaffolding Theory. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14, 3 (Dec. 2017). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/81061 [7] Lea M Daling and Sabine J Schlittmeier. 2024. Effects of augmented reality-, virtual reality-, and mixed reality–based training on objective performance measures and subjective evaluations in manual assembly tasks: a scoping review. Human factors 66, 2 (2024), 589–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208221105135 [8] Lea M. Daling, Marisa Tenbrock, Ingrid Isenhardt, and Sabine J. Schlittmeier. 2023. Assemble it like this! – Is AR- or VR-based training an effective alternative to video-based training in manual assembly? Applied Ergonomics 110 (jul2023), 104021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104021 [9] Hitesh Dhiman, Gustavo Alberto Rovelo Ruiz, Raf Ramakers, Danny Leen, and Carsten Röcker. 2024. Designing Instructions using Self-Determination Theory to Improve Motivation and Engagement for Learning Craft. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 673, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642136 [10] Sanika Doolani, Callen Wessels, Varun Kanal, Christos Sevastopoulos, Ashish Jaiswal, Harish Nambiappan, and Fillia Makedon. 2020. A Review of Extended Reality (XR) Technologies for Manufacturing Training. Technologies 8, 4 (Dec.2020), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies8040077 [11] Zigang Ge, Miaoyin Xi, and Yanfei Li. 2019. A literature review of the adaptive algorithms adopted in adaptive learning systems. In 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (ICSIP). IEEE, 254–258. [12] Eva Geurts, Arno Verstraete, and Maarten Wijnants. 2025. Empowering Adaptive Learning in VR Assembly Training Using Real-time Performance Tracking. In MIM 2025: 11th IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control. [13] Ilie Gligorea, Marius Cioca, Romana Oancea, Andra-Teodora Gorski, Hortensia Gorski, and Paul Tudorache. 2023. Adaptive Learning Using Artificial Intelligence in e-Learning: A Literature Review. Education Sciences 13, 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121216 [14] Sandra G Hart. 2006. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 50. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909 [15] Aziz Hasanov, Teemu H. Laine, Jongik Kim, and Tae-Sun Chung. 2024. Lightlore: An Adaptation Framework for Design and Development of xAPI-Based Adaptive Context-Aware Learning Environments. Electronics 13, 13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13132498 [16] Vincent Havard, David Baudry, Benoit Jeanne, Anne Louis, and Xavier Savatier. 2021. A use case study comparing augmented reality (AR) and electronic document-based maintenance instructions considering tasks complexity and operator competency level. Virtual Reality 25, 4 (Feb. 2021), 999–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00493-z [17] Steven Hoedt, Arno Claeys, El-Houssaine Aghezzaf, and Johannes Cottyn. 2020. Real Time Implementation of LearningForgetting Models for Cycle Time Predictions of Manual Assembly Tasks after a Break. Sustainability 12, 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145543 [18] Gaoping Huang, Xun Qian, Tianyi Wang, Fagun Patel, Maitreya Sreeram, Yuanzhi Cao, Karthik Ramani, and Alexander J. Quinn. 2021. AdapTutAR: An Adaptive Tutoring System for Machine Tasks in Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445283 [19] Li Ji, Chen Zhang, Haiwei Li, Ningning Zhang, Changhao Guo, Yong Zhang, and Xiaoyu Tang. 2023. A comprehensive experimental framework based on analysis of the pilot’s EEG and NASA-TLX questionnaire in a VR environment. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 237, 7 (2023), 869–878. [20] Julia M Juliano and Sook-Lei Liew. 2020. Transfer of motor skill between virtual reality viewed using a head-mounted display and conventional screen environments. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 17 (2020), 1–13. [21] Alexandra D Kaplan, Jessica Cruit, Mica Endsley, Suzanne M Beers, Ben D Sawyer, and Peter A Hancock. 2021. The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality as training enhancement methods: A meta-analysis. Human factors 63, 4 (2021), 706–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820904229 [22] Xiao-Wei Liu, Cheng-Yu Li, Sina Dang, Wei Wang, Jue Qu, Tong Chen, and Qing-Li Wang. 2022. Research on training effectiveness of professional maintenance personnel based on virtual reality and augmented reality technology. Sustainability 14, 21 (2022), 14351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114351 [23] Richard E Mayer. 2011. Applying the science of learning to multimedia instruction. In Psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 55. Elsevier, 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00003-X [24] Edward McAuley, Terry Duncan, and Vance V Tammen. 1989. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research quarterly for exercise and sport 60, 1(1989), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413 [25] Brian Mok and Wendy Ju. 2014. The push vs pull of information between autonomous cars and human drivers. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667239.2667287 [26] Roxana Moreno and Richard E Mayer. 2002. Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of educational psychology 94, 3 (2002), 598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.598 [27] Maria Murcia-Lopez and Anthony Steed. 2018. A comparison of virtual and physical training transfer of bimanual assembly tasks. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 24, 4 (2018), 1574–1583. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2793638 [28] Mir Murtaza, Yamna Ahmed, Jawwad Ahmed Shamsi, Fahad Sherwani, and Mariam Usman. 2022. AI-Based Personalized E-Learning Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Solutions. IEEE Access 10 (2022), 81323–81342. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3193938 [29] Matthias Neges, Stefan Adwernat, and Michael Abramovici. 2018. Augmented Virtuality for maintenance training simulation under various stress conditions. Procedia Manufacturing 19 (2018), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.01.024 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference in Through-life Engineering Services, University of Bremen, 7th and 8th November 2017. [30] Fabrizio Palmas, David Labode, David A. Plecher, and Gudrun Klinker. 2019. Comparison of a Gamified and NonGamified Virtual Reality Training Assembly Task. In 2019 11th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/vs-games.2019.8864583 [31] Sebastian Pimminger, Werner Kurschl, Lisa Panholzer, and Johannes Schönböck. 2021. Exploring the learnability of assembly tasks using digital work instructions in a smart factory. Procedia CIRP 104 (2021), 696–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.117 [32] Simon Rafaqat, Sahil Rafaqat, Saoul Rafaqat, and Dawood Rafaqat. 2022. The impact of workforce diversity on organizational performance: a review. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies 14, 2 (J) (2022), 39–50. [33] Juan Jesús Roldán, Elena Crespo, Andrés Martín-Barrio, Elena Peña-Tapia, and Antonio Barrientos. 2019. A training system for Industry 4.0 operators in complex assemblies based on virtual reality and process mining. Robotics and computer-integrated manufacturing 59 (2019), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.004 [34] Nailya R. Salikhova, Martin F. Lynch, and Albina B. Salikhova. 2020. Psychological Aspects of Digital Learning: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology 12, 2 (Oct. 2020), ep280. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584 [35] Sein Minn. 2022. AI-assisted knowledge assessment techniques for adaptive learning environments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 3 (2022), 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100050 [36] Mrigank S Shail. 2019. Using micro-learning on mobile applications to increase knowledge retention and work performance: a review of literature. Cureus 11, 8 (2019). [37] Joshua K Strakos, Matthew A Douglas, Blaine McCormick, and Michael Wright. 2023. A learning management system-based approach to assess learning outcomes in operations management courses. The International Journal of Management Education 21, 2 (2023), 100802. [38] Kachina Studer, Hing Lie, Zhen Zhao, Ben Thomson, Dishita G Turakhia, and John Liu. 2024. An Open-ended System in Virtual Reality for Training Machining Skills. In Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 392, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3648666 [39] Deborah L. Taylor, Michelle Yeung, and A. Z. Bashet. 2021. Personalized and Adaptive Learning. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58948-6_2 [40] Jessica Ulmer, Sebastian Braun, Chi-Tsun Cheng, Steve Dowey, and Jörg Wollert. 2022. Gamification of virtual reality assembly training: Effects of a combined point and level system on motivation and training results. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 165 (sep 2022), 102854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102854 [41] Jeroen JG Van Merrienboer and John Sweller. 2005. Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational psychology review 17 (2005), 147–177. [42] Paulette Vincent-Ruz and Nathan R. B. Boase. 2022. Activating discipline specific thinking with adaptive learning: A digital tool to enhance learning in chemistry. PLOS ONE 17, 11 (11 2022), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276086 [43] Spyros Vosinakis and Panayiotis Koutsabasis. 2017. Evaluation of visual feedback techniques for virtual grasping with bare hands using Leap Motion and Oculus Rift. Virtual Reality 22, 1 (May 2017), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-017-0313-4 [44] Josef Wolfartsberger, Robert Zimmermann, Gabriele Obermeier, and Daniel Niedermayr. 2023. Analyzing the potential of virtual reality-supported training for industrial assembly tasks. Computers in Industry 147 (2023), 103838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103838 [45] Peng Yang and Zhi Liu. 2022. The influence of immersive virtual reality (IVR) on skill transfer of learners: The moderating effects of learning engagement. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 17, 10 (2022), 62–73. [46] Jue Yu, Hoisoo Kim, Xiaoli Zheng, Zihan Li, and Xiangxiang Zhu. 2024. Effects of scaffolding and inner speech on learning motivation, flexible thinking and academic achievement in the technology-enhanced learning environment. Learning and Motivation 86 (2024), 101982. | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Proceedings Paper | - |
local.relation.ispartofseriesnr | 17 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1145/3734187 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2573-0142 | - |
local.provider.type | - | |
local.bibliographicCitation.btitle | Proceedingsbook of the Acm on Human-computer Interaction | - |
local.uhasselt.international | no | - |
item.fullcitation | VERSTRAETE, Arno; GEURTS, Eva & WIJNANTS, Maarten (2025) Does One-Size Training Fit All? Evaluating Adaptive Learning for VR Assembly Training. In: Nichols, Jeff (Ed.). Proceedingsbook of the Acm on Human-computer Interaction, ACM,. | - |
item.contributor | VERSTRAETE, Arno | - |
item.contributor | GEURTS, Eva | - |
item.contributor | WIJNANTS, Maarten | - |
item.accessRights | Closed Access | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 2573-0142 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.