Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/46409
Title: | Psychometric properties and reference values of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pediatric item banks Mobility, Upper Extremity, and Pain Interference in the Dutch population | Authors: | Korteling, Dorinde L. Ketelaar, Marjolijn Limmen, Selina Terwee, Caroline B. Bloemen, Manon A. T. RAMECKERS, Eugene Engelbert, Raoul H. H. van Oers, Hedy A. Haverman, Lotte Luijten, Michiel A. J. |
Issue Date: | 2025 | Publisher: | ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC | Source: | Journal of clinical epidemiology, 184 (Art N° 111855) | Abstract: | Objectives This study investigated psychometric properties and reference values of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pediatric v2.0 Mobility, Upper Extremity, and Pain Interference item banks, short forms and computerized adaptive tests (CATs) in the Dutch general population, supplemented with a clinical sample to improve low-end item parameter estimates. Study Design and Setting Children (aged 8-18 years) completed PROMIS item banks and legacy instruments (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 subdomain Physical Health, Numeric Pain Rating Scale). Structural validity of item banks was evaluated by fitting a graded response model and inspecting item-fit statistics. Reliability of item banks, short forms, and post-hoc CATs was expressed as standard error of measurement/theta. To compare measurement efficiency of instruments, relative efficiency was calculated. Construct validity was assessed by correlating item banks with legacy instruments. Differential item functioning between Dutch and US samples was evaluated. Results Seven hundred eighty three children participated: 555 children from the general population and 228 children receiving physical therapy. Structural validity was sufficient for all banks. PROMIS Pain Interference was reliable at the sample mean (standard error of theta < 0.32) and up to 2 standard deviations in the clinically relevant direction (indicating worse health). PROMIS Mobility and Upper Extremity scales were reliable in the clinically relevant direction, but less so within the normal range. CAT outperformed other assessment methods in efficiency. Construct validity was sufficient. No items displayed differential item functioning. Conclusion The PROMIS v2.0 pediatric Mobility, Upper Extremity, and Pain Interference item banks displayed sufficient validity in the Dutch general population and sufficient reliability in the clinically relevant direction. (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | Notes: | Luijten, MAJ (corresponding author), Amsterdam UMC, Emma Childrens Hosp, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat & Psychosocial Ca, G8 136,Postbox 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands. m.luijten@amsterdamumc.nl |
Keywords: | Computerized adaptive testing;Reliability;Validity;Psychometrics;Physical functioning;Patient-reported outcome measures | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/46409 | ISSN: | 0895-4356 | e-ISSN: | 1878-5921 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111855 | ISI #: | 001517369400001 | Rights: | 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Psychometric properties and reference values of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System .pdf | Published version | 589.07 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.