Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47397
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArents, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorHAESEVOETS, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorHermans , Fien-
dc.contributor.authorQUADFLIEG, Kirsten-
dc.contributor.authorCOPS, Dries-
dc.contributor.authorCRIEL, Maarten-
dc.contributor.authorRUTTENS, David-
dc.contributor.authorSurmont, Veerle-
dc.contributor.authorSalhi, Bihiyga-
dc.contributor.authorDerom, Eric-
dc.contributor.authorTroosters, Thierry-
dc.contributor.authorStevens , Dieter-
dc.contributor.authorBURTIN, Chris-
dc.contributor.authorDemeyer, Heleen-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-26T06:42:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-26T06:42:18Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-09-25T16:18:49Z-
dc.identifier.citationCancers, 17 (17) (Art N° 2886)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/47397-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients with early-stage (I-IIIA) resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often experience reduced physical activity (PA) after surgery. PA telecoaching may support a more active lifestyle, but evidence in this population is limited. Objective: To evaluate acceptability, feasibility, safety, and actual usage of an automated and manual PA telecoaching program following surgery for NSCLC. Methods: In this multicenter, single-blind study, patients received either an eight-week automated coaching program (ACP) with a customized smartphone app or a manual coaching program (MCP) with weekly phone calls from a coach. Both groups used an activity tracker, linked to their smartphone, to monitor steps and receive feedback. Primary outcomes included acceptability, feasibility, safety and usage, assessed via questionnaires and interviews. Secondary outcomes included objectively measured PA (accelerometry), functional exercise capacity (six-minute walk distance) and symptoms (dyspnea, fatigue) and quality of life, evaluated via questionnaires. Results: Nineteen patients (12 males; 68 +/- 6 years; baseline daily steps 7820 +/- 2799) were included. The majority (18/19) found the intervention enjoyable, and a minority (6/19) reported minor smartphone issues. All patients wore the activity tracker consistently. No adverse events occurred. The ACP required significantly less coach contact time compared to the MCP (25 +/- 14 vs. 54 +/- 15 min, p = 0.0003). No other differences in primary outcomes were observed between groups. Changes in secondary outcomes were limited in both groups. Conclusion: PA telecoaching is feasible, well accepted, and safe in patients with NSCLC post-surgery, with excellent activity tracker adherence. The ACP required less coach involvement. However, increasing PA remains challenging, and no conclusions can be made about the effectiveness of telecoaching. Future research should explore longer interventions in larger populations to assess efficacy and long-term outcomes.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding: H.D. was a post-doctoral research fellow of the Flemish Research Foundation (FWOFlanders, 12H7517N) during the study duration. The work was supported by a grant of Bijzonder Onderzoeks Fonds (BOF.STG.2021.0013.01 and BOF21KP15). H.D. and C.B. are supported by a grant from the Flemish Research Foundation (FWO-Flanders G0A0125N).-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.rights2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.subject.othernon-small cell lung cancer-
dc.subject.otherphysical activity-
dc.subject.othertelecoaching-
dc.subject.otherfeasibility-
dc.subject.otheracceptability-
dc.titlePhysical Activity Telecoaching in Post-Surgical NSCLC Patients: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study Exploring Feasibility, Acceptability and Actual Usage-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue17-
dc.identifier.volume17-
local.format.pages16-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesDemeyer, H (corresponding author), Univ Ghent, Dept Rehabil Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.; Demeyer, H (corresponding author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Rehabil Sci, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.-
dc.description.noteseva.arents@ugent.be; sarah.haesevoets@uhasselt.be;-
dc.description.notesfien.hermans@ugent.be; kirsten.quadflieg@pxl.be; dries.cops@uhasselt.be;-
dc.description.notesmaarten.criel@zol.be; david.ruttens@zol.be; veerle.surmont@uzgent.be;-
dc.description.notesbihiyga.salhi@ugent.be; eric.derom@uzgent.be;-
dc.description.notesthierry.troosters@kuleuven.be; dieter.stevens@uzgent.be;-
dc.description.noteschris.burtin@uhasselt.be; h.demeyer@ugent.be-
local.publisher.placeMDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr2886-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers17172886-
dc.identifier.pmid40940983-
dc.identifier.isi001569641500001-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Arents, Eva; Hermans, Fien; Demeyer, Heleen] Univ Ghent, Dept Rehabil Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Haesevoets, Sarah; Quadflieg, Kirsten; Cops, Dries; Burtin, Chris] Hasselt Univ, Fac Rehabil Sci, Rehabil Res Ctr, REVAL, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Haesevoets, Sarah; Quadflieg, Kirsten; Cops, Dries; Burtin, Chris] Hasselt Univ, Biomed Res Inst, BIOMED, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Hermans, Fien; Troosters, Thierry; Demeyer, Heleen] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Rehabil Sci, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Quadflieg, Kirsten] PXL Univ Appl Sci & Arts, Ctr expertise Care Innovat, Dept PXL Healthcare, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Criel, Maarten; Ruttens, David] Hasselt Univ, Hosp Oost Limburg, Fac Med & Life Sci, Dept Lung Dis, B-3600 Genk, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Surmont, Veerle; Salhi, Bihiyga; Derom, Eric; Stevens, Dieter] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Pulm Med, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationArents, Eva; HAESEVOETS, Sarah; Hermans , Fien; QUADFLIEG, Kirsten; COPS, Dries; CRIEL, Maarten; RUTTENS, David; Surmont, Veerle; Salhi, Bihiyga; Derom, Eric; Troosters, Thierry; Stevens , Dieter; BURTIN, Chris & Demeyer, Heleen (2025) Physical Activity Telecoaching in Post-Surgical NSCLC Patients: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study Exploring Feasibility, Acceptability and Actual Usage. In: Cancers, 17 (17) (Art N° 2886).-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.contributorArents, Eva-
item.contributorHAESEVOETS, Sarah-
item.contributorHermans , Fien-
item.contributorQUADFLIEG, Kirsten-
item.contributorCOPS, Dries-
item.contributorCRIEL, Maarten-
item.contributorRUTTENS, David-
item.contributorSurmont, Veerle-
item.contributorSalhi, Bihiyga-
item.contributorDerom, Eric-
item.contributorTroosters, Thierry-
item.contributorStevens , Dieter-
item.contributorBURTIN, Chris-
item.contributorDemeyer, Heleen-
crisitem.journal.eissn2072-6694-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.