Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47499
Title: Life Cycle Assessment of Novel Two-Terminal (2T) and Four-Terminal (4T) Perovskite/CIGS Solar Cells
Authors: Costa, Daniele
MARTULLI, Alessandro 
van den Oever, Anne
Mueller, Amelie
Degens, Roel
Rajagolapan, Neethi
Paetzold, Ulrich W.
LIZIN, Sebastien 
VERMANG, Bart 
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: WILEY
Source: Progress in Photovoltaics,
Status: Early view
Abstract: Perovskite solar cells are an emerging photovoltaic technology promising higher efficiency than monocrystalline silicon solar cells. This study assesses the environmental impacts of novel two-terminal (2T) and four-terminal (4T) perovskite/copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) tandem solar cells at technology readiness levels (TRL) 3 (2T configuration) and 4 (4T configuration). Based on the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, impacts are assessed from cradle to gate, focusing on climate change impacts per 1 m2 of solar cell, 1 kWp of module capacity, and the environmental 1 kWh of produced energy. Other relevant environmental impact categories, cumulative energy demand (CED) and energy payback time (EPBT), are also considered. The impacts of critical parameters are a sensitivity analysis. The LCA results indicate global warming impacts (GWI) of 49 and 50 kg CO2eq/m2, 170 and 174 kg CO2eq/kWp for the 2T and 4T configurations, respectively. For both configurations, the GWI ranges from 3.2 to 5.6 gCO2eq/kWh. Prospective investigated in climate change impact assessments suggest that manufacturing impacts may increase by 4% by 2050 without climate policies because of changes in the European energy mix. Conversely, stringent climate policies could reduce climate change impacts by 77%. The sensitivity analyses identify electricity use as the most critical factor for climate change impacts. CED values are 1219 and 1266 MJ/m2 for the 2T and 4T configurations, respectively. For impacts per energy output, the CED is 4231 and 4380 MJ/kWp for the 2T and 4T configurations, respectively. For both configurations, the CED ranges from 80 to 140 kJ/kWh. The average EPBT values are 0.74 and 0.76 years for the 2T and 4T configurations, respectively.
Notes: Costa, D (corresponding author), Flemish Inst Technol Res VITO, Flemish, Belgium.; Costa, D (corresponding author), EnergyVille, Genk, Belgium.
daniele.costa@vito.be
Keywords: climate change;copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS);cumulative energy demand (CED);energy payback time (EPBT);perovskite;prospective life cycle assessment (pLCA);tandem solar cells
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47499
ISSN: 1062-7995
e-ISSN: 1099-159X
DOI: 10.1002/pip.70008
ISI #: 001573619400001
Rights: 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Progress in Photovoltaics - 2025 - Costa - Life Cycle Assessment of Novel Two‐Terminal 2T and Four‐Terminal 4T .pdf
  Restricted Access
Early view3.54 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.