Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47550
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHusen, Theresia Feline-
dc.contributor.authorGenechten, Silke van-
dc.contributor.authorCLAESSENS, Jade-
dc.contributor.authorHeuts, Samuel-
dc.contributor.authorPACKLE, Loren-
dc.contributor.authorMaessen, Jos G.-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Alaaddin-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-20T06:23:45Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-20T06:23:45Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-10-17T15:00:04Z-
dc.identifier.citationInnovations:Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery,-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/47550-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The clinical outcomes of bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) in situ were compared with Y-grafts in endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (endo-CABG), a less-invasive alternative to conventional CABG, providing reduced trauma and faster recovery.Methods: A retrospective single-center study was performed from January 2016 until February 2023 on endo-CABG patients, dividing them into in situ BIMA graft or Y-graft recipients. As endo-CABG was performed in all patients requiring surgical revascularization, this represents an unselected cohort. The primary outcome comprised freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The secondary outcomes were target lesion revascularization (TLR) and 1-year overall survival.Results: A total of 1,328 endo-CABG patients (BIMA in situ, n = 693; Y-graft, n = 634) were included. Overall, characteristics of both groups were comparable, except that Y-graft patients had more comorbidities (diabetes mellitus and myocardial infarction), which was reflected in the EuroSCORE II. Furthermore, most Y-graft patients had triple-vessel disease and a higher number of bypasses required. The 1-year MACCE-free survival did not differ significantly between the groups (91.9% vs 89%; univariable hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.96 to 2.11, P = 0.079; multivariable HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.63, P = 0.771), as did the 1-year survival rate (95.7% vs 93.2%; univariable HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.75, P = 0.046; multivariable HR =1.34, 95% CI: 0.77 to 2.33, P = 0.297). TLR did not differ significantly between groups (univariable HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.22 to 2.08, P = 0.499) or after adjustment (multivariable HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.08 to 1.24, P = 0.100).Conclusions: Creating a Y-graft for distal lesions and in cases in which more than 2 anastomoses are required serves as a favorable alternative without a difference between in situ and Y-grafts in 1-year MACCE-free survival.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC-
dc.rightsThe Author(s) 2025-
dc.subject.otherbilateral internal mammary artery; Y-grafting; endoscopic coronary-
dc.subject.otherartery bypass grafting-
dc.titleY-Graft Versus In Situ Bilateral Internal Mammary Arteries in Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
local.format.pages8-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesHusen, TF (corresponding author), Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Jl Salemba Raya 6, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.-
dc.description.notesfelinetheresia@gmail.com-
local.publisher.place2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.statusEarly view-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/15569845251377059-
dc.identifier.isi001586085200001-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Husen, Theresia Feline] Univ Indonesia Salemba, Fac Med, Jakarta, Indonesia.-
local.description.affiliation[Genechten, Silke van; Claessens, Jade; Packle, Loren; Yilmaz, Alaaddin] Jessa Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Claessens, Jade] UHasselt Hasselt Univ, Fac Med & Life Sci, LCRC, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Heuts, Samuel; Maessen, Jos G.] Maastricht Univ, Heart & Vasc Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands.-
local.description.affiliation[Heuts, Samuel; Maessen, Jos G.; Yilmaz, Alaaddin] Maastricht Univ, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht CARIM, Maastricht, Netherlands.-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorHusen, Theresia Feline-
item.contributorGenechten, Silke van-
item.contributorCLAESSENS, Jade-
item.contributorHeuts, Samuel-
item.contributorPACKLE, Loren-
item.contributorMaessen, Jos G.-
item.contributorYilmaz, Alaaddin-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationHusen, Theresia Feline; Genechten, Silke van; CLAESSENS, Jade; Heuts, Samuel; PACKLE, Loren; Maessen, Jos G. & Yilmaz, Alaaddin (2025) Y-Graft Versus In Situ Bilateral Internal Mammary Arteries in Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. In: Innovations:Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery,.-
crisitem.journal.issn1556-9845-
crisitem.journal.eissn1559-0879-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
husen-et-al-2025-y-graft-versus-in-situ-bilateral-internal-mammary-arteries-in-endoscopic-coronary-artery-bypass.pdf
  Restricted Access
Early view347.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.