Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47826| Title: | Mechanisms of exercise limitation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity: a case of engine-chassis mismatch | Authors: | Foulkes, Stephen J. MOURA FERREIRA, Sara MILANI, Mauricio BEKHUIS, Youri FALTER, Maarten DELPIRE, Boris PAUWELS, Rik Stroobants , Sarah Jogani, Siddharth Vanhentenrijk, Simon ALTINTAS, Sibel Jasaityte, Ruta STASSEN, Jan HERBOTS, Lieven CLAESSEN, Guido Haykowsky, Mark J. VERWERFT, Jan |
Issue Date: | 2025 | Publisher: | AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC | Source: | American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 329 (5) , p. H1126 -H1136 | Abstract: | Obesity is a major risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its impact on limitations in peak oxygen uptake (Vo(2peak)) and its Fick determinants remains unclear. We assessed these factors in patients with obesity and patients without obesity with HFpEF, and non-HFpEF controls. Patients with HFpEF were subgrouped by body mass index [body mass index (BMI) >= 30 or < 30 kg/m(2)] into HFpEF with (HFpEF(Obese), n = 139) or without obesity (HFpEF(Nonobese), n = 317), and non-HFpEF controls (CON, n = 270). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography assessed Vo(2peak), cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), heart rate (HR), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) dynamics, and arterio-venous oxygen difference (a-vO(2)diff). HFpEF(Obese) tended to have higher absolute Vo(2peak) (+7%, P = 0.069), and significantly higher peak exercise CO and SV, with no differences in HR or a-vO(2)diff. Resting and exercise mPAP and mPAP/CO slopes did not differ between HFpEF obesity phenotypes. In contrast, bodyweight-indexed Vo(2peak) was markedly lower in HFpEF(Obese) (-23%) despite comparable indexed peak CO and SV. Regardless of HFpEF subgroup, Vo(2peak), central (CO, HR, mPAP) and peripheral factors (a-vO(2)diff) were markedly impaired in HFpEF versus CON (P < 0.05 for all). Therefore, although patients with HFpEF(Obese) have preserved absolute Vo(2peak) and cardiac reserve, bodyweight-indexing reveals that these adaptations are insufficient for the heightened metabolic and functional demands induced by obesity. Alternatively, several physiological HFpEF features are not exacerbated by obesity. This highlights the importance of incorporating weight loss alongside multicomponent therapeutic strategies to address exercise intolerance in HFpEF. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Patients with obesity with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have larger hearts and preserved cardiac reserve, but this was insufficient to maintain bodyweight-indexed Vo(2peak) at comparable levels to patients without obesity. Obesity did not exacerbate other HFpEF impairments, such as decreased oxygen extraction or elevated pulmonary pressures. This suggests weight loss may help to improve exercise intolerance in obese patients with HFpEF, but should be combined with other treatments to target all of the features that contribute to exercise intolerance in HFpEF. | Notes: | Foulkes, SJ (corresponding author), Univ Alberta, Coll Hlth Sci, Integrated Cardiovasc Exercise Physiol & Rehabil i, Edmonton, AB, Canada.; Foulkes, SJ (corresponding author), St Vincents Inst Med Res, Heart Exercise & Res Trials HEART Lab, Melbourne, Australia. foulkes@ualberta.ca |
Keywords: | cardiac reserve;exercise echocardiography;HFpEF;obesity;oxygen uptake | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47826 | ISSN: | 0363-6135 | e-ISSN: | 1522-1539 | DOI: | 10.1152/ajpheart.00587.2025 | ISI #: | 001617888500002 | Rights: | 2025 The Authors. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0. Published by the American Physiological Society | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanisms of exercise limitation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity_ a case of engine-chassis mismatch.pdf | Published version | 1.32 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.