Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47848Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | POP STEFANIJA, Ana | - |
| dc.contributor.author | PIERSON, Jo | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-03T08:20:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-03T08:20:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-12-02T09:46:38Z | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Platforms & Society, 2 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47848 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This article proposes a framework for qualitatively investigating platforms by studying them in action, through their embeddedness and the everyday interactions with users. Grounded on two foundations– the research affordances of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the approach of researching with care, two distinct visions emerge: the ability to see platforms (the dynamic and constantly evolving ecosystem of complementors, practices, and arrangements) and the ability to see like a platform (the classifications generated through inferential analytics and affinity profiling). These visions, understood as ways of seeing and knowing, emerge from the repurposing of the GDPR’s Right of Access (Article 15), no longer as a legal right but as a research tool. As part of a larger empirical study, 47 participants underwent a four-month autoethnographic process of acquiring, inspecting and analysing their personal data, while keeping a diary to record their emotions, observations and responses. The research framework consists of (a) using data rights as a research tool, (b) researching with care and (c) employing diaries as a data collection and reflexivity tool. Besides introducing a new approach for studying platforms, this framework also facilitates critical and interpretative co-research, enabling the creation of critical knowledge and the acquisition of empowering skills for participants. Although total vision is impossible and every perspective has its limitations and blind spots, even partial visions allow for a state of platform observability and the production of valid and valuable knowledge. | - |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Funding The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research was done as part of the project DELICIOS ‘An integrated approach to study the delegation of conflict-of-interest decisions to autonomous agents’, funded by the Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek–Vlaanderen (FWO) grant number G054919N. Acknowledgements The authors would like to express their gratitude to the editor of Platforms & Society for his patient guidance during the entire process, from submission to publication. We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers, whose valuable suggestions and thoughtful, thorough feedback significantly improved this complex article. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | Sage | - |
| dc.rights | The Author(s) 2025 Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us. sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). | - |
| dc.subject.other | Platform research | - |
| dc.subject.other | data rights | - |
| dc.subject.other | GDPR | - |
| dc.subject.other | participatory research | - |
| dc.subject.other | researching with care | - |
| dc.subject.other | critical pedagogy | - |
| dc.title | Seeing (like) a platform: Using data rights for participatory study of platforms | - |
| dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 2 | - |
| local.format.pages | 14 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A2 | - |
| local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Article | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.status | Early view | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/29768624251383736 | - |
| local.provider.type | CrossRef | - |
| local.uhasselt.international | no | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
| item.fullcitation | POP STEFANIJA, Ana & PIERSON, Jo (2025) Seeing (like) a platform: Using data rights for participatory study of platforms. In: Platforms & Society, 2. | - |
| item.contributor | POP STEFANIJA, Ana | - |
| item.contributor | PIERSON, Jo | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pop-stefanija-pierson-2025-seeing-(like)-a-platform-using-data-rights-for-participatory-study-of-platforms.pdf | Early view | 406.81 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.