Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47909
Title: Contextual Analysis and Implementation Strategies for an Age-Friendly Emergency Department Uptake: The FRED Study Protocol
Authors: Fernandez, Alisa Cantarero
Nickel, Christian H.
Dreher-hummel, Thomas
Grossmann, Florian
Unlu, Luca
Carpenter, Christopher R.
HEEREN, Pieter 
Ruiter, Robert A. C.
Simon, Michael
Zuniga, Franziska
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: WILEY
Source: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,
Status: Early view
Abstract: Background Older adults frequently present to the Emergency Department (ED). In response, a Swiss university hospital introduced age-friendly interventions and achieved Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation (GEDA) by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP). However, the impact of previously introduced interventions and the reasons behind emergency clinicians' varying uptake or lack of continued use remain unclear. To further improve patient outcomes, conducting a contextual analysis to identify implementation barriers and facilitators is crucial, followed by the development of tailored implementation strategies supporting the sustainable uptake of all age-friendly program elements. The project's overall aim is to systematically promote the uptake and sustainable re-implementation of the existing age-friendly ED program. The first study phase outlined in this protocol ("Phase A") focuses on 2 key objectives: (1) to assess current age-friendly interventions in the ED and identify barriers and facilitators affecting their reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance; (2) to develop tailored implementation strategies for re-implementing program elements.Methods This project uses a modified implementation mapping in 5 Steps across 2 Phases. Phase A includes Steps 1-4: (1) conducting a contextual analysis using a mixed-methods design combining observations, interviews, patient chart reviews, E-survey and a Gemba walk; (2) identifying expected intervention and implementation outcomes, performance objectives; (3) adapting, extending, or developing tailored implementation strategies based on the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy; and (4) co-designing an implementation protocol to guide re-implementation. The follow-up Phase B will involve the re-implementation of the intervention elements and co-designing the evaluation protocol (Step 5) for the implementation process.Conclusion Age-friendly EDs are essential for person-centered emergency care, enhancing safety and quality of care for older adults. This study will provide insights into adaptable, evidence-informed implementation strategies that support behavioral change among emergency clinicians to increase patient reach and sustainability of age-friendly interventions for complex ED settings.
Notes: Zúñiga, F (corresponding author), Univ Basel, Dept Publ Hlth, Nursing Sci, Basel, Switzerland.
franziska.zuniga@unibas.ch
Keywords: emergency department;frailty;geriatric emergency medicine;implementation science;older adults
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47909
ISSN: 0002-8614
e-ISSN: 1532-5415
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70230
ISI #: 001628827200001
Rights: 2025 The Author(s). Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.