Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47971
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBruckers, Liesbeth-
dc.contributor.advisorGovarts, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorFilippousi, Paraskevi-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-06T08:26:52Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-06T08:26:52Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2026-01-06T08:26:52Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/47971-
dc.description.abstractHuman biomonitoring, measuring chemicals or their metabolites directly in tissues and fluids, can, in principle, reveal EU-wide exposure patterns. The pooled HBM4EU data (2014–2021) were assembled from national and regional cohorts that each followed different, often not clearly documented, sampling schemes. The resulting dataset lacks a unified probabilistic design, and any uneven coverage against geographic and socio-demographic aspects, as well as the absence of sampling weights make the derivation of ”European” reference exposure values a challenge. This thesis focuses on the HBM4EU children’s age-group (6–12 yrs) and phthalates/mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP) as a test-case. Exploratory analysis of the children dataset confirmed a North–East bias, an excess of high-education households and urban–rural mismatches; sampling year shadows cohort, magnifying site heterogeneity. Pronounced MBzP gradients by region, DEGURBA, sampling season and education affirmed the need for weights and cluster-robust inference, potentially providing a transferable template for other future initiatives. A population–standardisation grid for EU-27 children was built crossing one-way Eurostat margins for region (North, South, West, East), sex (male, female), season (each pre-weighted at 0.25), DEGURBA (urban, towns/suburbs, rural) and household-education (ISCED0–2, 3–4, ≥5). Age was fixed at 9 years, considering also the regional Eurostat data showing that uniform single-year counts across the 6–12-yr span. The Cartesian product yields 288 cells; each cell weight equals the product of its five marginal proportions and the set is normalised to 1. This construction assumes the five dimensions are mutually independent; in the absence of joint tabulations. These grid weights served a dual role: for model–based routes: each regression was fitted to the HBM4EU children data, after which its fitted values were projected onto the 288 cell profiles and post-stratified with the grid weights to represent an average EU child. Two specifications were considered: (i) an ordinary-least-squares model, with and without region–specific interaction blocks, evaluated with delta-method SEs; and (ii) a random-intercept mixed model, with and without interactions, propagating uncertainty via the analytic Delta-method, as well a “MCf ixed” Monte-Carlo SE (resampling) only the fixed-effect coefficients but also a “MC-full” MonteCarlo SE (resampling both the fixed effects and a new cohort-level intercept on every replicate). For design–based routes: the same weights were merged back to the HBM4EU data; dividing each cell weight by the number of sampled children in that cell, yielding observation–level probabilities that drove direct post-stratification, survey-design analysis and marginal raking, with weight trimming explored as sensitivity checks. The EU-27 standardised geometric mean estimates yielded narrower ranges, both with the model-based and design-based approaches, once cohort clustering was not considered. Declaring cohorts as PSUs inflated the confidence bands. Weight-trimming and marginal raking reduce design effects and sharpen intervals with negligible impact on the central estimate, whereas extending the calibration to a region×age margin lowered the geometric mean notably while substantially cutting the effective sample size. Next steps could focus on: (a) future initiatives collecting study-specific design weights before pooling to keep all downstream estimates design-consistent; (b) reporting both an efficient mixed-effects projection (MC-fixed SE) and a raked, cluster-robust survey estimate to bracket uncertainty; (c) test on the effect of replacing regional margins with finer, e.g. country-level or joint margins (if available); (d) include single-year age calibration and extend the framework to adolescents, adults and further biomarkers; and (e) explore weight- and cluster-aware design-based regression (svyglm) or GEE/GEE2, providing population-average estimates with sandwich-robust SEs.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherHBM4EU-
dc.subject.otherbiomonitoring-
dc.subject.otherbiomarkers-
dc.subject.otherchemicals exposure-
dc.subject.otherphthalates-
dc.subject.otherweighting-
dc.subject.otherdirect standardisation-
dc.subject.otherpost-stratification-
dc.titleDerivation of European exposure values of internal exposure to environmental pollutants using human biomonitoring data-
dc.typeTheses and Dissertations-
local.format.pages76-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatT2-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedMaster thesis-
dc.description.otherMaster of Statistics and Data Science-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.contributorFilippousi, Paraskevi-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationFilippousi, Paraskevi (2025) Derivation of European exposure values of internal exposure to environmental pollutants using human biomonitoring data.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Master theses
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Filippousi_Paraskevi_1953491_MBProef_2.pdf2.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.