Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48024Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Food, European | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Authority, Safety | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lázaro, Elena | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Parnell, Stephen | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Civera, Antonio | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Schenk, Martijn | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Abrahantes, Jose | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Navas-Cortes, Juan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Thulke, Hans-Hermann | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pecori, Francesco | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Koh, Joshua | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Schans, Jan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | AERTS, Marc | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zancanaro, Gabriele | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Vos, Sybren | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kaluski, Tomasz | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-08T13:10:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-08T13:10:28Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-12-04T17:13:02Z | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Efsa Supporting Publications, 22 (12) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48024 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | At the request of the European Commission, EFSA prepared the general guidelines for surveys of plant pests, describing the legal, international and scientific context in which the surveys are designed, the basic principles implemented for surveillance of quarantine pests and introducing the concepts needed for the design of statistically sound and risk-based surveys. Three types of specific surveys are addressed: detection surveys for substantiation of pest freedom, delimiting surveys to determine the boundaries of a potential infested zone, and monitoring surveys for prevalence estimation when measuring the effectiveness of eradication measures or for the confirmation of a low pest prevalence area. For each type of survey, the survey parameters are introduced and their interactions analysed showing the importance of the assumptions that are taken for each one of them: (i) the aims of the survey are defined as achieving a certain level of confidence of detecting a given pest prevalence (design prevalence), this reflects the trade-off between the acceptable level of the risk and availability of resources that determine the strength of the evidence to support the conclusion of the survey; (ii) the target population is described by its structure and size, including the risk factors; and (iii) the method sensitivity is defined as the combination of the sampling effectiveness and the diagnostic sensitivity for each inspection unit. EFSA's RiPEST and RiBESS+ tools 1 are introduced for calculating the sample size using the survey parameters as input values for a statistically sound and risk-based survey design. The mathematical principles behind the tools are in line with the International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures. The survey design is flexible and can be tailored to each pest and specific situation in the Member States. Once the survey is implemented following this approach, the 1 https://r4eu.efsa.europa.eu/ | - |
| dc.description.sponsorship | EFSA wishes to thank in particular the members of the EFSA workinggroup on pest survey methods that contributed to the preparation of these guidelines. EFSA alsowishes to thank Giulia Mattion, Alicia Culot, Naliny Feliu and Etienne Babin (trainees in theEnvironment, Plants and Ecotoxicology Unit – Plant Health Monitoring Team) for their support tothe finalisation and publication of this scientific output. EFSA wishes to acknowledge theNetherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA), Instituto Valenciano deInvestigaciones Agrarias (IVIA) and the Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection – NationalResearch Council of Italy (CNR) for the support provided to this scientific output in the contextof grants GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2021/11 and GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2021/08 – Lot 1 and Lot 2. EFSA alsowishes to acknowledge the Member State institutions that contributed to the workshops in 2018and 2019 held for the development of the survey approaches for Phyllosticta citricarpa,Xylella fastidiosa and Agrilus planipennis, and used when preparing this document. EFSA wishesto thank the reviewers of this document: Antonio Vicent Civera, Stephen Parnell and DavidMakowski | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | - | |
| dc.rights | European Food Safety Authority, 2025Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged EFSA may include images or other content for which it does not hold copyright. In such cases,EFSA indicates the copyright holder and users should seek permission to reproduce the contentfrom the original source.Figure 3: © Antonio Vicent Civera; Figures 4 and 14: © NVWA, NL; Figure 13: © EPPO GlobalDatabase; Figure 15: © Hugh Evans, Forest Research, UK. | - |
| dc.subject.other | confidence level | - |
| dc.subject.other | delimiting survey | - |
| dc.subject.other | design prevalence | - |
| dc.subject.other | detection survey | - |
| dc.subject.other | methodsensitivity | - |
| dc.subject.other | monitoring survey | - |
| dc.subject.other | target population | - |
| dc.title | Update of general guidelines for statistically sound and risk-based surveys of plant pests | - |
| dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 12 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 22 | - |
| local.format.pages | 125 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A2 | - |
| local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Article | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.status | Early view | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2903/sp.efsa.2025.en-9788 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | - | |
| local.provider.type | - | |
| local.uhasselt.international | yes | - |
| item.contributor | Food, European | - |
| item.contributor | Authority, Safety | - |
| item.contributor | Lázaro, Elena | - |
| item.contributor | Parnell, Stephen | - |
| item.contributor | Civera, Antonio | - |
| item.contributor | Schenk, Martijn | - |
| item.contributor | Abrahantes, Jose | - |
| item.contributor | Navas-Cortes, Juan | - |
| item.contributor | Thulke, Hans-Hermann | - |
| item.contributor | Pecori, Francesco | - |
| item.contributor | Koh, Joshua | - |
| item.contributor | Schans, Jan | - |
| item.contributor | AERTS, Marc | - |
| item.contributor | Zancanaro, Gabriele | - |
| item.contributor | Vos, Sybren | - |
| item.contributor | Kaluski, Tomasz | - |
| item.fullcitation | Food, European; Authority, Safety; Lázaro, Elena; Parnell, Stephen; Civera, Antonio; Schenk, Martijn; Abrahantes, Jose; Navas-Cortes, Juan; Thulke, Hans-Hermann; Pecori, Francesco; Koh, Joshua; Schans, Jan; AERTS, Marc; Zancanaro, Gabriele; Vos, Sybren & Kaluski, Tomasz (2025) Update of general guidelines for statistically sound and risk-based surveys of plant pests. In: Efsa Supporting Publications, 22 (12). | - |
| item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| crisitem.journal.issn | 2397-8325 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFSA Supporting Publications - 2025 - - Update of general guidelines for statistically sound and risk‐based surveys of.pdf | Published version | 6.93 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.