Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48265
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLOVE, Nazanin-
dc.contributor.authorPerko, T-
dc.contributor.authorLEROI-WERELDS, Sara-
dc.contributor.authorGeysmans, R-
dc.contributor.authorSCHROEYERS, Wouter-
dc.contributor.authorMALINA, Robert-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-27T14:36:36Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-27T14:36:36Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2026-01-16T15:31:16Z-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of risk research, 28 (11) , p. 1279 -1304-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/48265-
dc.description.abstractThe cement industry is a significant contributor to global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for approximately 7% of total emissions. To mitigate these emissions, the use of industrial by-products as substitutes for raw materials in cement production not only reduces reliance on virgin raw materials but also contributes to the circular economy by repurposing waste. Alternative cement, made from secondary raw materials such as naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM), provides a promising solution for lowering greenhouse gas emissions associated with traditional cement production. However, the public acceptance of such innovations is critical for their successful adoption. This study investigates end-users' perceptions of alternative cements made with NORM-contained by-products across Belgium, Czechia, and Slovenia. We explored how perceived risks and benefits, psychometric risk characteristics, and affective responses influence attitudes towards this sustainable cement. Data were collected through a survey of 1,224 participants, all of whom had recent experiences in building or renovating their homes. The findings reveal significant cross-country differences in how these factors impact attitudes and intentions to use alternative cement. Our results highlight the importance of tailored communication strategies that address specific national concerns and emphasise the most valued benefits in promoting the adoption of sustainable cement alternatives.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Euratom research and training programme 2019–2020 under grant [agreement No 900009].-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher-
dc.subject.otherSustainable cement-
dc.subject.othernaturally occurring radioactive materials-
dc.subject.otherpublic acceptance-
dc.subject.otherrisk and benefit perception-
dc.subject.otheraffective evaluation-
dc.titleInsights into end-users' perceptions and adoption of sustainable cement produced with naturally occurring radioactive material-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage1304-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage1279-
dc.identifier.volume28-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13669877.2025.2569439-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001590825700001-
local.provider.typeWeb of Science-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fullcitationLOVE, Nazanin; Perko, T; LEROI-WERELDS, Sara; Geysmans, R; SCHROEYERS, Wouter & MALINA, Robert (2025) Insights into end-users' perceptions and adoption of sustainable cement produced with naturally occurring radioactive material. In: Journal of risk research, 28 (11) , p. 1279 -1304.-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.contributorLOVE, Nazanin-
item.contributorPerko, T-
item.contributorLEROI-WERELDS, Sara-
item.contributorGeysmans, R-
item.contributorSCHROEYERS, Wouter-
item.contributorMALINA, Robert-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
crisitem.journal.issn1366-9877-
crisitem.journal.eissn1466-4461-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Jan 28, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.