Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48309
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcGOLDRICK, Dominic-
dc.contributor.authorDECOCK, Marie-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-29T13:53:52Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-29T13:53:52Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2026-01-14T08:10:09Z-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Human Rights Law Review, 1 , p. 34 -59-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/48309-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleStunning and Ritual Slaughter: Animal Welfare as ‘Public Morality’ and Assessing Necessity-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage59-
dc.identifier.spage34-
dc.identifier.volume1-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA2-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.fullcitationMcGOLDRICK, Dominic & DECOCK, Marie (2025) Stunning and Ritual Slaughter: Animal Welfare as ‘Public Morality’ and Assessing Necessity. In: European Human Rights Law Review, 1 , p. 34 -59.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorMcGOLDRICK, Dominic-
item.contributorDECOCK, Marie-
item.accessRightsEmbargoed Access-
item.embargoEndDate2027-01-31-
crisitem.journal.issn1361-1526-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Assessing Public Morality and the Necessity of Restrictions on ECHR Rights FINAL 17 September 2024.docx
  Until 2027-01-31		Peer-reviewed author version137.75 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open    Request a copy
EHRLR_1_2025_McGoldrick and DeCock_Assessing public morality and the necessity of restrictions on ECHR rights.pdf
  Restricted Access		Published version442.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.