Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48454
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGROSSI, Zoe-
dc.contributor.authorWouters, Jan-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-09T10:51:33Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-09T10:51:33Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2026-02-09T10:50:09Z-
dc.identifier.citationA Comparison of the European, Inter-American, African and Arab Human Rights Courts: Institutional Aspects, T.C.M. Asser Press, p. 25 -49-
dc.identifier.isbn978-94-6265-695-6-
dc.identifier.isbn978-94-6265-695-6-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/48454-
dc.description.abstractIndependence and impartiality are essential criteria for courts to contribute to the rule of law and uphold human rights. Judges must be free from any form of external pressure and may not hold any personal prejudice or bias. Additionally, the institutional framework of the human rights Courts must contain sufficient safeguards to ensure their independence and impartiality. This chapter provides a comparative analysis of the organisational structure, Statutes and Rules of Court governing the judges within the ECtHR, the ACtHPR, the IACtHR and the ArabCtHR from the perspective of the principles of independence and impartiality. It delves into the various facets of judges’ professional life, examining such matters as appointment procedures, dismissal, tenure, privileges and immunities as well as restrictions on external activities. The chapter aims to discern the commonalities and divergences between the regional human rights Courts. It argues that, despite positive steps taken by the Courts, there is still room for improvement.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherT.C.M. Asser Press-
dc.rightsT.M.C. ASSER PRESS and the authors 2025-
dc.subject.otherIndependence-
dc.subject.otherImpartiality-
dc.subject.otherAppointment of judges-
dc.subject.otherTenure-
dc.subject.otherDismissal of judges-
dc.subject.otherIncompatibilities-
dc.subject.otherPrivileges and immunities-
dc.titleThe Judges, The Bench, and The Rules of Court-
dc.typeBook Section-
dc.identifier.epage49-
dc.identifier.spage25-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatB2-
local.publisher.placeThe Hague-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedBook Section-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnrChapter 2-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-94-6265-695-6_2-
local.provider.typeCrossRef-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleA Comparison of the European, Inter-American, African and Arab Human Rights Courts: Institutional Aspects-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationGROSSI, Zoe & Wouters, Jan (2025) The Judges, The Bench, and The Rules of Court. In: A Comparison of the European, Inter-American, African and Arab Human Rights Courts: Institutional Aspects, T.C.M. Asser Press, p. 25 -49.-
item.contributorGROSSI, Zoe-
item.contributorWouters, Jan-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Finale versie_Chapter 2 The Judges, the Bench and the Rules of Court.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version375.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.