Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48688
Title: Patterns of Avian Influenza Virus detection from active surveillance in wild birds: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: DUPAS, Marie-Cécile 
Falcucci, Alessandra
Pittiglio, Claudia
Roche, Xavier
Cinardi, Giuseppina
Delgado, Amy
Seck, Ismaila
Dhingra, Madhur
Gilbert, Marius
Issue Date: 2026
Publisher: ELSEVIER
Source: One Health, 22 (Art N° 101338)
Abstract: We summarised active surveillance data to identify patterns and ecological factors correlated with AIV detection in wild birds, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We screened 2851 articles from the PubMed and Scopus databases, out of which 197 met our eligibility criteria and were selected for further analysis. The dataset encompassed 367 wild bird species from 72 avian families. The pooled prevalence of sampled birds was 4.80% (95% CI: [3.91-5.77%]) across 900,469 samples collected during the period 1971-2023, with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 99.7%) across studies. Among continents, Central America displayed the highest prevalence at 9.89% (95% CI: [2.25-21.99%]), albeit based on relatively few samples (n=4205). In temperate regions, prevalence peaked in autumn, at 5.82% (95% CI: [3.84-8.15%]), while in tropical regions, prevalence was notably higher during the dry season (2.33%, 95% CI: [0.38-5.54%]) than during the wet season (0.22%, 95% CI: [0.00-0.90%]). Prevalence varied significantly across avian families, with Anatidae, the most extensively sampled family, exhibiting a prevalence of 6.19% (95% CI: [5.10-7.37%]). Migratory species and those associated with freshwater habitats also exhibited higher AIV detection. Moreover, meta-regression analyses revealed that seasonal patterns of AIV detection differed across regions. Despite this, high heterogeneity across studies remained, likely driven by differences in surveillance intensity, diagnostic methods, and unmeasured ecological factors. This meta-analysis highlights key spatial, taxonomic, and temporal patterns in AIV prevalence among sampled birds. The findings underscore the need for harmonised, representative surveillance to better anticipate emerging avian influenza risks.
Notes: Dupas, MC (corresponding author), Univ libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.; Dupas, MC (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Hasselt, Belgium.
mariececile.dupas@ulb.be
Keywords: Influenza A;Meta-analysis;Wild bird species;Viral prevalence rate
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48688
e-ISSN: 2352-7714
DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2026.101338
ISI #: 001689952700001
Rights: 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
main.pdfPublished version2.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.