Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48800
Title: Modelling approaches for estimating vaccine effectiveness of consecutive SARS-CoV-2 variant sublineages in the absence of study-specific genetic sequencing data, VEBIS hospital network, Europe, 2023/24
Authors: Antunes, Liliana
Nunes, Baltazar
Nunez, Olivier
Martinez-Baz, Ivan
DOCKX, Yinthe 
Borg, Maria-Louise
Oroszi, Beatrix
Duffy, Roisin
Durwald, Ralf
Kuliese, Monika
Machado, Ausenda
Petrovic, Goranka
Lazar, Mihaela
Guiomar, Raquel
Rio, Virginia Alvarez
Castilla, Jesus
Dziugyte, Ausra
MAGERMAN, Koen 
Turi, Gergo
Fitzgerald, Margaret
Hackmann, Carolin
Jancoriene, Ligita
Gomez, Veronica
Makaric, Zvjezdana Lovric
Popovici, Odette
Rojas-Castro, Madelyn
Rose, Angela M. C.
Editors: Gagniuc, Paul Aurelian
Issue Date: 2026
Publisher: PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Source: Plos One, 21 (3) (Art N° e0343988)
Abstract: Introduction Genetic changes in COVID-19 variants/sublineages (VSLs) can reduce vaccine effectiveness (VE). Timely VSL-specific VE estimates are essential, but study-specific VSL identification by whole genome sequencing (the "gold standard") is expensive and time-consuming. Alternatively, VSL-specific VE has been estimated from external sequencing data (VSL predominance period by proxy: PP). We propose two novel approaches for use in test-negative design (TND) studies to estimate VSL-specific VE when study-specific VSL identification is not possible.Methods We demonstrate the variant category model (VCM) and the variant proportion model (VPM) approaches. Using data from a hospital-based TND study among adults >= 65 years, during the period of sequential predominance of XBB and BA.2.86 in 2023/24, we estimated the VE as (1-OR) x 100%. For the VCM, we used a binary variable categorising "most likely underlying sublineage" based on publicly available sequencing data. For the VPM, we used a continuous variable with values from 0 to 1 representing the weekly proportion of BA.2.86. We validated results using study-specific VSL identification from sequenced study data (SD) and the standard PP approach.Results Overall, at 14-59 days post vaccination, VE point estimates against XBB were within +/- 3% absolute for the VE estimated using both models, with an equivalent standard PP validation. We could not validate using SD, as there were no vaccinated XBB cases. Against BA.2.86, VE was lower than against XBB, and the VCM and VPM results were within +/- 7% absolute of each other, with lowest validation results from SD but equivalent results from the PP.Conclusions Both proposed approaches produced similar VE estimates to those from well-known methods. The VPM could also provide VE estimates when the validation techniques were limited by low sample size.
Notes: Antunes, L (corresponding author), Epiconcept, Paris, France.
l.antunes@epiconcept.fr
Keywords: Humans;Europe;Aged;Whole Genome Sequencing;SARS-CoV-2;COVID-19;COVID-19 Vaccines;Vaccine Efficacy
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48800
ISSN: 1932-6203
e-ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343988
ISI #: 001709596700018
Rights: 2026 Antunes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Open access
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
xx.pdfPublished version1.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.