Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48818
Title: Continuous Versus Intermittent Loop Diuretics Step-by-Step Protocol in Acute Heart Failure (DIUR-AHF): A Propensity-Matched Analysis
Authors: Ruocco, Gaetano
Salzano, Andrea
Franceschi , Sara
Lorusso, Roberto
Pirrotta, Filippo
Stefanini, Andrea
Pagliaro, Antonio
Severino, Paolo
D'Amato, Andrea
Vizza, Carmine D.
Crisci, Giulia
Guazzi, Marco
Frea, Simone
Pastorini, Guido
Feola, Mauro
Fedele, Francesco
Palazzuoli, Alberto
Issue Date: 2026
Publisher: WILEY
Source: Journal of the American Heart Association, 15 (6) (Art N° e045911)
Abstract: Background Loop diuretics are used to solve congestion in acute heart failure. However, a clear indication about the best infusion modality, dose, and duration of the treatment has not yet been established. In this analysis of the DIUR-AHF (Different Loop Diuretic Dosing and Administration in Acute Heart Failure) study, we aimed to investigate the effects of different diuretic administration modalities (ie, intermittent versus continuous furosemide infusion) and dose (high dose [HD] versus low dose) on congestion, renal function, and outcome. Methods Patients received intermittent or continuous intravenous loop diuretics infusion combined as a 1:1 ratio for a period of 72 to 120 hours. HD was defined as a high loop diuretic dose >120 mg/d. Clinical outcome was evaluated in terms of death or heart failure rehospitalization over a 6-month follow-up period. Results A total of 370 patients with AHF were included in this analysis, 189 treated with continuous intravenous loop diuretics infusion and 181 with intermittent intravenous loop diuretics infusion. At baseline, the continuous intravenous loop diuretic infusion group showed increased median values of blood urea (P=0.010) and creatinine (P=0.017). Dividing our sample according to loop diuretic dosage, the HD group revealed similar congestion and weight loss compared with the low-dose group; however, the HD group showed a reduced diuretic efficiency (-0.13 [-0.22 to -0.07] versus -0.32 [-0.59 to -0.20] kg/d; P<0.001) and an increased rate of adverse event occurrence (55% versus 20%; P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed the association between HD treatment and poor postdischarge outcome (hazard ratio, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.23-3.10]; P=0.005). Conclusions An HD of loop diuretics infusion revealed an increased risk for adverse events together with reduced diuretic response. Our results extend previous findings revealing the association between HD diuretics and prognosis in patients with chronic HF. Additional studies may confer loop diuretic response in relation to the other decongestive treatments.
Notes: Palazzuoli, A (corresponding author), Le Scotte Hosp, Cardiothorac & Vasc Dept, Cardiovasc Dis Unit, Viale Bracci, I-53100 Siena, Italy.
palazzuoli2@unisi.it
Keywords: acute heart failure;congestion;loop diuretics;management
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48818
e-ISSN: 2047-9980
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.125.045911
ISI #: WOS:001718321600001
Rights: 2026 The Author(s). Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.