Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48879
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRaat, Willem-
dc.contributor.authorVAN DEN BULCK, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorSoetaert, Justine-
dc.contributor.authorVan de Putte, Marie-
dc.contributor.authorVan Pottelbergh, Gijs-
dc.contributor.authorDe Schreye, Robrecht-
dc.contributor.authorAertgeerts, Bert-
dc.contributor.authorVaes, Bert-
dc.contributor.editorMcCarthy, Siobhán-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-09T13:18:45Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-09T13:18:45Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-04-07T11:25:02Z-
dc.identifier.citationInternational journal for quality in health care, 38 (1) (Art N° mzag037)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/48879-
dc.description.abstractBackground Electronic health records (EHRs) can potentially revolutionize primary care by enhancing data storage, communication, and quality measure reporting. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of digital tools in Belgium, highlighting the potential of EHR data in audit and feedback (A&F) strategies. This study aims to outline the design and national implementation process of automated A&F monitoring instruments (locally known as barometers), in Belgian primary care.Methods Using Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory, we developed three monitoring instruments for primary care: COVID-19 vaccination coverage, type 2 diabetes management, and appropriate antibiotic use. Quality indicators were selected at the national level using a Rand-modified Delphi method and validated by the Flemish Institute for Quality of Health Care (VIKZ). Data were collected from general practitioners' EHR systems, aggregated at the practice level, and analyzed using the Healthdata.be platform. Feedback was provided through the Healthstat.be interface, incorporating local and regional benchmarks and evidence-based recommendations.Results The COVID-19 vaccination monitoring instrument included 5223 GPs from 2269 practices, the type 2 diabetes monitoring instrument involved 9373 GPs from 3596 practices, and the antibiotics monitoring instrument covered 10 486 GPs from 3724 practices. These monitoring instruments collectively covered approximately eight million patients. Feedback reports were designed to be low in cognitive load, frequent, and benchmarked against the best-performing decile of practices. Integration of active, in-EHR delivery and formal evaluation of use are planned for future phases.Conclusion The implementation of automated A&F instruments in Belgian primary care demonstrated the feasibility and scalability of such systems. These monitoring instruments can provide valuable insights for quality improvement and support the transition toward a Learning Health System. Future work will focus on expanding the range of monitoring instruments and integrating active feedback mechanisms within EHR systems.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding Development of the monitoring instruments was funded by the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI). Intego was funded regularly by the Flemish Government (Ministry of Health and Welfare). We hereby state the independence of the authors from the funders. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Healthdata.be, Agoria, and the Belgian EHR developers for their continued and invaluable contribution to the monitoring instrument implementation effort.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS-
dc.rightsThe Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.-
dc.subject.otheraudit and feedback-
dc.subject.otherquality improvement-
dc.subject.otherprimary care-
dc.subject.otherelectronic health record-
dc.subject.othertype 2 diabetes-
dc.subject.otherantibiotics-
dc.titleDevelopment and early implementation of automated audit and feedback monitoring instruments in Belgian primary care: lessons for scalable systems-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.volume38-
local.format.pages8-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesRaat, W (corresponding author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Kapucijnenvoer 7,Bus 7001,Blok H, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.-
dc.description.noteswillem.raat@kuleuven.be-
local.publisher.placeGREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnrmzag037-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/intqhc/mzag037-
dc.identifier.pmid41832994-
dc.identifier.isi001720135800001-
dc.contributor.orcidVan Pottelbergh, gijs/0000-0002-4189-3517-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Raat, Willem; Van den Bulck, Steve; Soetaert, Justine; Van de Putte, Marie; Van Pottelbergh, Gijs; Aertgeerts, Bert; Vaes, Bert] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Kapucijnenvoer 7,Bus 7001,Blok H, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Van den Bulck, Steve] UHasselt, Fac Med & Life Sci, Res Grp Healthcare & Eth, Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[De Schreye, Robrecht] Sciensano, Hlth Serv Res, Brussels, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fullcitationRaat, Willem; VAN DEN BULCK, Steve; Soetaert, Justine; Van de Putte, Marie; Van Pottelbergh, Gijs; De Schreye, Robrecht; Aertgeerts, Bert & Vaes, Bert (2026) Development and early implementation of automated audit and feedback monitoring instruments in Belgian primary care: lessons for scalable systems. In: International journal for quality in health care, 38 (1) (Art N° mzag037).-
item.contributorRaat, Willem-
item.contributorVAN DEN BULCK, Steve-
item.contributorSoetaert, Justine-
item.contributorVan de Putte, Marie-
item.contributorVan Pottelbergh, Gijs-
item.contributorDe Schreye, Robrecht-
item.contributorAertgeerts, Bert-
item.contributorVaes, Bert-
item.contributorMcCarthy, Siobhán-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn1353-4505-
crisitem.journal.eissn1464-3677-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
mzag037.pdfPublished version1.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.