Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48947
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHermans, Babette-
dc.contributor.authorWAETERLOOS, Cato-
dc.contributor.authorOpgenhaffen, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-23T12:06:24Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-23T12:06:24Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-04-20T12:21:07Z-
dc.identifier.citationOnline information review,-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/48947-
dc.description.abstractPurposeFact-checks have emerged as tools to correct misinformation, with mainly experimental research demonstrating their positive effects. Additionally, the main focus of fact-check studies lies on specific knowledge correction, while fact-checkers' democratic goals go beyond that. This study accommodates these methodological and conceptual limitations by investigating whether fact-checks can contribute to political knowledge (current affairs knowledge and contested issue knowledge).Design/methodology/approachThe study relies on a three-wave panel (N = 2.214). Respondents ranged between 16 and 30 years old and data were gathered during the Belgian elections.FindingsThe results show that both exposure to and subsequent consumption of fact-checks are positively related to current affairs knowledge and contested issue knowledge on the between-person level. This means that people who generally see and read with fact-checks more often tend to have higher knowledge overall. On the within-person level, relationships between exposure and reading and knowledge effects were less straightforward. The irregular relationships suggest that short-term changes in fact-check exposure and reading do not consistently translate into knowledge gains. These results suggest that the relationship between exposure and reading of fact-checks and knowledge differs more between individuals over time than it does within one individual.Originality/valueThis study is one of the first to investigate fact-check exposure effects over a longer period of time, relying on panel data. Additionally, by going beyond specific fact-check knowledge and relying instead on more general measures of political knowledge, this study contributes to the current fact-checking literature by bridging the desired goals of fact-check organizations and potential knowledge outcomes.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-10-2025-0841-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe results show that both exposure to and subsequent consumption of fact-checks are positively related to current affairs knowledge and contested issue knowledge on the between-person level. This means that people who generally see and read with fact-checks more often tend to have higher knowledge overall. On the within-person level, relationships between exposure and reading and knowledge effects were less straightforward. The irregular relationships suggest that short-term changes in fact-check exposure and reading do not consistently translate into knowledge gains. These results suggest that the relationship between exposure and reading of fact-checks and knowledge differs more between individuals over time than it does within one individual.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherEMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD-
dc.rightsEmerald Publishing Limited-
dc.subject.otherPolitical knowledge-
dc.subject.otherMisinformationw-
dc.subject.otherLongitudinal data-
dc.subject.otherFact-checking-
dc.titleFrom fact-checks to informed citizens: investigating political knowledge effects with longitudinal data-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
local.format.pages15-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesHermans, B (corresponding author), KU Leuven Humanities & Social Sci Grp, Media Informat & Persuas Lab, Dept Commun Sci, Leuven, Belgium.-
dc.description.notesbabette.hermans@kuleuven.be; cato.waeterloos@uhasselt.be;-
dc.description.notesmichael.opgenhaffen@kuleuven.be-
local.publisher.placeFloor 5, Northspring 21-23 Wellington Street, Leeds, W YORKSHIRE,-
local.publisher.placeENGLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.statusEarly view-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/OIR-10-2025-0841-
dc.identifier.isi001734816400001-
dc.contributor.orcidHermans, Babette/0009-0007-6297-781X-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Hermans, Babette; Opgenhaffen, Michael] KU Leuven Humanities & Social Sci Grp, Media Informat & Persuas Lab, Dept Commun Sci, Leuven, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Waeterloos, Cato] Hasselt Univ, Sch Social Sci, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fullcitationHermans, Babette; WAETERLOOS, Cato & Opgenhaffen, Michael (2026) From fact-checks to informed citizens: investigating political knowledge effects with longitudinal data. In: Online information review,.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsEmbargoed Access-
item.embargoEndDate2027-04-09-
item.contributorHermans, Babette-
item.contributorWAETERLOOS, Cato-
item.contributorOpgenhaffen, Michael-
crisitem.journal.issn1468-4527-
crisitem.journal.eissn1468-4535-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
xx.pdf
  Until 2027-04-09
Peer-reviewed author version478.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.