Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48947
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHermans, Babette-
dc.contributor.authorWAETERLOOS, Cato-
dc.contributor.authorOpgenhaffen, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-23T12:06:24Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-23T12:06:24Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-04-20T12:21:07Z-
dc.identifier.citationOnline information review,-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/48947-
dc.description.abstractPurposeFact-checks have emerged as tools to correct misinformation, with mainly experimental research demonstrating their positive effects. Additionally, the main focus of fact-check studies lies on specific knowledge correction, while fact-checkers' democratic goals go beyond that. This study accommodates these methodological and conceptual limitations by investigating whether fact-checks can contribute to political knowledge (current affairs knowledge and contested issue knowledge).Design/methodology/approachThe study relies on a three-wave panel (N = 2.214). Respondents ranged between 16 and 30 years old and data were gathered during the Belgian elections.FindingsThe results show that both exposure to and subsequent consumption of fact-checks are positively related to current affairs knowledge and contested issue knowledge on the between-person level. This means that people who generally see and read with fact-checks more often tend to have higher knowledge overall. On the within-person level, relationships between exposure and reading and knowledge effects were less straightforward. The irregular relationships suggest that short-term changes in fact-check exposure and reading do not consistently translate into knowledge gains. These results suggest that the relationship between exposure and reading of fact-checks and knowledge differs more between individuals over time than it does within one individual.Originality/valueThis study is one of the first to investigate fact-check exposure effects over a longer period of time, relying on panel data. Additionally, by going beyond specific fact-check knowledge and relying instead on more general measures of political knowledge, this study contributes to the current fact-checking literature by bridging the desired goals of fact-check organizations and potential knowledge outcomes.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-10-2025-0841-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe results show that both exposure to and subsequent consumption of fact-checks are positively related to current affairs knowledge and contested issue knowledge on the between-person level. This means that people who generally see and read with fact-checks more often tend to have higher knowledge overall. On the within-person level, relationships between exposure and reading and knowledge effects were less straightforward. The irregular relationships suggest that short-term changes in fact-check exposure and reading do not consistently translate into knowledge gains. These results suggest that the relationship between exposure and reading of fact-checks and knowledge differs more between individuals over time than it does within one individual. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the entire YouVoice Team for their collaboration on the extensive data collection. We would also like to thank Dr Jeroen Mulder for his insight and advice on the data analysis.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherEMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD-
dc.rightsEmerald Publishing Limited-
dc.subject.otherPolitical knowledge-
dc.subject.otherMisinformationw-
dc.subject.otherLongitudinal data-
dc.subject.otherFact-checking-
dc.titleFrom fact-checks to informed citizens: investigating political knowledge effects with longitudinal data-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
local.format.pages15-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesHermans, B (corresponding author), KU Leuven Humanities & Social Sci Grp, Media Informat & Persuas Lab, Dept Commun Sci, Leuven, Belgium.-
dc.description.notesbabette.hermans@kuleuven.be; cato.waeterloos@uhasselt.be;-
dc.description.notesmichael.opgenhaffen@kuleuven.be-
local.publisher.placeFloor 5, Northspring 21-23 Wellington Street, Leeds, W YORKSHIRE,-
local.publisher.placeENGLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.statusEarly view-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/OIR-10-2025-0841-
dc.identifier.isi001734816400001-
dc.contributor.orcidHermans, Babette/0009-0007-6297-781X-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Hermans, Babette; Opgenhaffen, Michael] KU Leuven Humanities & Social Sci Grp, Media Informat & Persuas Lab, Dept Commun Sci, Leuven, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Waeterloos, Cato] Hasselt Univ, Sch Social Sci, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fullcitationHermans, Babette; WAETERLOOS, Cato & Opgenhaffen, Michael (2026) From fact-checks to informed citizens: investigating political knowledge effects with longitudinal data. In: Online information review,.-
item.embargoEndDate2027-04-09-
item.accessRightsEmbargoed Access-
item.contributorHermans, Babette-
item.contributorWAETERLOOS, Cato-
item.contributorOpgenhaffen, Michael-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn1468-4527-
crisitem.journal.eissn1468-4535-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
xx.pdf
  Until 2027-04-09
Peer-reviewed author version478.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
ACFrOgCPFDSlL-JFPKdpoL4Hk0HYqagUaH65yNl8eaSt8jlQkGoPriWDBGsK_r7L2W551ZSL4h3Fp.pdf
  Restricted Access
Early view403.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.